Comments close after three months.
A rant against government stupidity »
« Putting audio files on Landlord-Law
-
-
-
The Landlord Law Newsletter, For landlords and letting agents, separate tenants version available
Join Ben and Tessa's Front Liner newsletter, for social housing workers
[Ben Reeve Lewis is remembering dancing days of Yore...] My beloved Frazzy is a teacher of Salsa and… [more]
What is a premium tenancy? How does it tie in with deposits and payment of rent? I answer five que… [more]
Landlords need to be constantly vigilant as criminals are out there and targeting properties like y… [more]
If a property is due to be demolished before the end of the fixed term, where does that leave the te… [more]
Break clauses can be difficult to interpret and this is an example of a particularly confusing one. … [more]
Here is a question to the blog clinic from Jay who is a landlord: Hi I protected the deposit within … [more]
A big item of news this week was the launch of the Deposit Guard tenancy deposit scheme. However a… [more]
Here is a question to the blog clinic from Andrew who is a tenant: I have, today, received an email … [more]
[In view of the snow, Ben Reeve Lewis has abandoned his Hawaiian shirt for a pair of slippers...… [more]
An uneven playing field for landlords
The new HMO licensing regulations are now effective and the three month ‘grace period’ has now ended. Landlords who have failed to obtain a license face fines of up to £20,000, plus risk tenants applying for rent repayment orders while being unable to evict them via the section 21 procedure. But have the government played fair with landlords?
In a recent press release the British Property Federation accused government of deliberately making the regime more complex by allowing local discretion as opposed to following a standardised approach across the country.
For example there is a huge variation in license fees, which run from under £100 to over £1,000 per property (for example see the HMO license fee list I am developing). This variation is massively unfair on the landlords in the expensive boroughs, particularly those with a large portfolio, who will see their colleagues with similar properties paying a fraction of the fees they are having to pay. Tenants will suffer also as rents will no doubt rise to cover this additional expense. It appears that the governing legislation (the Housing Act 2004) allows capping but for reasons best known to themselves government preferred to allow the current uneven playing field.
The BPA also criticise the government for its delay in its preparations which meant that local authorities were not up to speed in April when the regulations first came in.
No related posts.
Back to top