Homeless hostel too comfortable says VAT man

Reading the recent issue of Roof Magazine, I came across this utterly bonkers decision by the VAT authorities.

Byker Housing Association has built a new 31 bed hostel for the homeless in Newcastle – however the VAT authorities have deemed it to be a commercial building (i.e. a hotel) rather than a residential one – because it is too comfortable! This means that it becomes liable for VAT of £315,000 – which will put Byker Bridge out of business.

Under the VAT rules, hostels should be exempt from VAT if they are for a residential use, designed as a dwelling, or used for a relevant charitable purpose. Despite this, because the VAT office does not have a workable definition of a homeless persons hostel, and because the new hostel is quite nice, they are treating it as if it were a hotel for tax purposes. Even though the building was partly developed with Housing Corporation finance which is only available for non commercial ventures!

Hopefully this decision will be set aside. Otherwise Byker Bridge will go out of business, there will be 1,500 per year more homeless on the streets of Newcastle, and it will have a knock on effect on other registered social landlords developing homeless hostels

Related posts:

  1. Help for tenants made homeless by riots and civil disorder
  2. Rented commercial and residential property question
  3. Five points on residential licenses

Back to top

If you are a landlord, agent, advisor or tenant you will find more help and guidance on my main Landlord Law site. See also my online shop Your Law Store.

>> Follow this link to read our comments policy. If you have a landlord and tenant related problem please do not ask it here but use our >> Blog Clinic.

Comments close after three months.

Sorry, comments are closed for this post.




»

«
Recent posts:
Five ways for landlords to protect properties against fraudsters and criminals

Landlords need to be constantly vigilant as criminals are out there and targeting properties like y[more]

Is the landlord obliged to rehouse this tenant?

If a property is due to be demolished before the end of the fixed term, where does that leave the te[more]

How to interpret this confusing break clause?

Break clauses can be difficult to interpret and this is an example of a particularly confusing one. [more]

This week on School for Landlords I look at guarantee forms, when you should use them and how they w[more]

Can my tenants use the 3x deposits rule?

Here is a question to the blog clinic from Jay who is a landlord: Hi I protected the deposit within [more]

Landlord Law Blog roundup from 29 January

A big item of news this week was the launch of the Deposit Guard tenancy deposit scheme.  However a[more]

Can the landlord make a further deposit deduction?

Here is a question to the blog clinic from Andrew who is a tenant: I have, today, received an email [more]

Ben Reeve Lewis Friday Newsround #44

[In view of the snow, Ben Reeve Lewis has abandoned his Hawaiian shirt for a pair of slippers...[more]

How a landlord saved his tenant’s life

Sometimes it is good to check up on tenants - they may be in trouble and need help. [more]

Can a student be charged £100 for ending a tenancy early?

A student changes her mind after signing a tenancy agreement and agrees with the landlord that she w[more]