<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Refunds after Foxtons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/04/25/refunds-after-foxtons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/04/25/refunds-after-foxtons/</link>
	<description>From landlord and tenant solicitor Tessa Shepperson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:01:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OFT victory in Foxtons unfair contract terms case &#171; FreeLegalWeb</title>
		<link>http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/04/25/refunds-after-foxtons/comment-page-1/#comment-1575</link>
		<dc:creator>OFT victory in Foxtons unfair contract terms case &#171; FreeLegalWeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/?p=249#comment-1575</guid>
		<description>[...] regarding their unfair contract terms. To read the background to this, see my previous posts here and here. The OFT was challenging the clauses under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] regarding their unfair contract terms. To read the background to this, see my previous posts here and here. The OFT was challenging the clauses under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

