Comments on: Four more cases on possession proceedings http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/05/12/four-more-cases-on-possession-proceedings/ From landlord and tenant solicitor Tessa Shepperson Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:12:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Problems with advance rent payments « FreeLegalWeb http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/05/12/four-more-cases-on-possession-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-7388 Problems with advance rent payments « FreeLegalWeb Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:03:02 +0000 http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/?p=263#comment-7388 [...] will be covered (or at least implied in some way) in the forthcoming Court of Appeal  decision in Universal Estates v Tiensia, although the PainSmith blog tells us that this decision is not going to be published until October [...] [...] will be covered (or at least implied in some way) in the forthcoming Court of Appeal  decision in Universal Estates v Tiensia, although the PainSmith blog tells us that this decision is not going to be published until October [...]

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/05/12/four-more-cases-on-possession-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-375 Anonymous Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:47:25 +0000 http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/?p=263#comment-375 Not mentioned in LAG or is the fact that in Universal Estates v. Tiensia the rent was £2,400 as so not an AST as this would exceed the £25K limit. Surely therefore the case was not an AST, regardless of that any paperwork might have said, and so the deposit did not need to be covered? Expensive mistake not to have argued that one. Not mentioned in LAG or is the fact that in Universal Estates v. Tiensia the rent was £2,400 as so not an AST as this would exceed the £25K limit. Surely therefore the case was not an AST, regardless of that any paperwork might have said, and so the deposit did not need to be covered? Expensive mistake not to have argued that one.

]]> By: Tessa http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/05/12/four-more-cases-on-possession-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-313 Tessa Tue, 12 May 2009 21:41:00 +0000 http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/?p=263#comment-313 I confess I was surprised that you had not already done something - I did check! I confess I was surprised that you had not already done something – I did check!

]]> By: Nearly Legal http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/05/12/four-more-cases-on-possession-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-312 Nearly Legal Tue, 12 May 2009 20:21:00 +0000 http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/?p=263#comment-312 Dang, where is my copy of LAG? Why haven't I seen it yet?<br /><br />Expect a near duplicate of this post when I do.<br /><br />Not surprised about the compliance with 14 days finding - I think I had mentioned the possibility and frankly the County Court lottery at present means pretty much any variation on the theme is possible. Dang, where is my copy of LAG? Why haven’t I seen it yet?

Expect a near duplicate of this post when I do.

Not surprised about the compliance with 14 days finding – I think I had mentioned the possibility and frankly the County Court lottery at present means pretty much any variation on the theme is possible.

]]>