Comments close after three months.
SPLA/NLA merger dispute continues »
« Pain Smith on Foxtons
-
-
-
The Landlord Law Newsletter, For landlords and letting agents, separate tenants version available
Join Ben and Tessa's Front Liner newsletter, for social housing workers
[Ben Reeve Lewis is remembering dancing days of Yore...] My beloved Frazzy is a teacher of Salsa and… [more]
What is a premium tenancy? How does it tie in with deposits and payment of rent? I answer five que… [more]
Landlords need to be constantly vigilant as criminals are out there and targeting properties like y… [more]
If a property is due to be demolished before the end of the fixed term, where does that leave the te… [more]
Break clauses can be difficult to interpret and this is an example of a particularly confusing one. … [more]
Here is a question to the blog clinic from Jay who is a landlord: Hi I protected the deposit within … [more]
A big item of news this week was the launch of the Deposit Guard tenancy deposit scheme. However a… [more]
Here is a question to the blog clinic from Andrew who is a tenant: I have, today, received an email … [more]
[In view of the snow, Ben Reeve Lewis has abandoned his Hawaiian shirt for a pair of slippers...… [more]
Landlords out of pocket for deposits – DPS may be best after all!
A report published in The Times today highlights the growing problem of landlords having to pay up for deposits, when agents go bust.
Under the two ‘insurance based’ tenancy deposit schemes (MyDeposits and the Tenancy Deposit Scheme run by the Dispute Service) if the agent deals with the deposit on behalf of the landlord, the agent holds the deposit money. If the agent becomes insolvent, this does not affect the tenant (other than perhaps a delay in getting paid) as the insurance company pays out.
However it will have a serious effect on the landlord. This is because the deposit schemes are entitled to recoup their losses by claiming the money back from the landlord, on tbe basis that the landlord is the employer of the failed agent.
The Times report states that “hundreds of letting agents have ceased trading in recent months” and goes on to report that “MyDeposits has received 279 notifications of a letting agent going into liquidation and being unable to return the deposit”. In the majority, if not all of those cases, the landlord will have had to pay.
The problem is more likley to occur with MyDeposits as the Dispute Service are now refusing to accept agents who are not members of ARLA, RICS or a similar professional body.
Landlords letting through non regulated agents should therefore think carefully before allowing the agent to manage the deposit unless it is protected by the Deposit Protection Service where the deposit money is actually lodged with the company so there is no possibility of it being lost.
Related posts:
Back to top