<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OFT victory in Foxtons unfair contract terms case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/07/10/oft-victory-in-foxtons-unfair-contract-terms-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/07/10/oft-victory-in-foxtons-unfair-contract-terms-case/</link>
	<description>From landlord and tenant solicitor Tessa Shepperson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:12:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The OFT v. Foxton case – commission on renewals &#171; FreeLegalWeb</title>
		<link>http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/07/10/oft-victory-in-foxtons-unfair-contract-terms-case/comment-page-1/#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>The OFT v. Foxton case – commission on renewals &#171; FreeLegalWeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/?p=304#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>[...] confusion regarding the recent decision in the case of the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) v. Foxtons (which I reported on here). One of the questions being asked is what exactly is the status now of clauses providing for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] confusion regarding the recent decision in the case of the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) v. Foxtons (which I reported on here). One of the questions being asked is what exactly is the status now of clauses providing for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Siddle</title>
		<link>http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/07/10/oft-victory-in-foxtons-unfair-contract-terms-case/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Siddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/?p=304#comment-346</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for this clear and concise appraisal of the case. We on www.legalbeagles.info (you also follow us on twitter) have been awaiting the Judgment on this case as it is highly relevant to our own cause, the UTCCR&#039;s arguement in the OFT V Banks case currently under appeal at the House of Lords.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Again, many thanks for the write up, we will continue to watch your blogs with interest&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Julian Siddle - Administrator - www.legalbeagles.info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for this clear and concise appraisal of the case. We on <a href="http://www.legalbeagles.info" rel="nofollow">http://www.legalbeagles.info</a> (you also follow us on twitter) have been awaiting the Judgment on this case as it is highly relevant to our own cause, the UTCCR&#39;s arguement in the OFT V Banks case currently under appeal at the House of Lords.</p>
<p>Again, many thanks for the write up, we will continue to watch your blogs with interest</p>
<p>Julian Siddle &#8211; Administrator &#8211; <a href="http://www.legalbeagles.info" rel="nofollow">http://www.legalbeagles.info</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

