<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tenancy deposit roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/08/30/tenancy-deposit-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/08/30/tenancy-deposit-roundup/</link>
	<description>From landlord and tenant solicitor Tessa Shepperson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:01:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessa Shepperson</title>
		<link>http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/08/30/tenancy-deposit-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Tessa Shepperson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/?p=328#comment-384</guid>
		<description>This is looked at in my post &lt;a href=&quot;http://landlordlaw.blogspot.com/2009/06/new-tenancy-deposit-case-deposit-paid.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New tenancy deposit case - deposit paid before 7 April 07&lt;/a&gt;.  Although with all these cases it is a County Court decision and therefore not necessarily binding on another court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is looked at in my post <a href="http://landlordlaw.blogspot.com/2009/06/new-tenancy-deposit-case-deposit-paid.html" rel="nofollow">New tenancy deposit case &#8211; deposit paid before 7 April 07</a>.  Although with all these cases it is a County Court decision and therefore not necessarily binding on another court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2009/08/30/tenancy-deposit-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/?p=328#comment-383</guid>
		<description>Hi, I was wondering what counts as a new AST for the purposes of TDP. I have read Saad v Hogan and it would appear that only a new fixed term AST is recognised. I signed an ammendment agreeing to a new rent amount after April 07 (the original agreement was signed in March). Could it be argued that this constitutes a new AST, or will it just be viewed as an ammendment?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I was wondering what counts as a new AST for the purposes of TDP. I have read Saad v Hogan and it would appear that only a new fixed term AST is recognised. I signed an ammendment agreeing to a new rent amount after April 07 (the original agreement was signed in March). Could it be argued that this constitutes a new AST, or will it just be viewed as an ammendment?</p>
<p>Many Thanks,</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

