Tenancy deposit protction – now only 30% failure

weymouth2In July 2008 I did a post called Tenancy Deposit Protection – 62% failure which was based on a survey done by the Deposit Protection Service (DPS), one of the three tenancy deposit protection schemes. This survey said that 62% of landlords were flouting the law and not protecting tenants deposits as they should under the tenancy deposit protection scheme regulations, which came into force in April 2007.

One year on, the DPS have done another survey, and this shows that the situation has improved. However 30% of landlords are still openly admitting that they are not registering deposits. This is despite the fact that any s21 notices served on the tenant will be invalid until the deposit is protected, and that the tenant can also go to court and claim a ‘fine’ of three times the deposit money.

The conclusion reached by the DPS is that the government’s idea of having a national register of landlords should be implemented. Many landlords however are stongly opposed to such a scheme.

Perhaps the best solutions would be

(1) to make sure that the requirment to protect deposits is widely known (so tenants are more likley question landlords this), and
(2) to make it easy for tenants to claim the penalty from non compliant landlords.

The the word is gradully getting out (which is probably why more landlords are now protecting deposits), but claiming the penalty award can still be a nightmare. The legislation has proved to be so problematic that no-one really knows where they stand. As can be seen from other posts about tenancy deposits on this blog!

What do you think is the best solution?

Related posts:

  1. Localism Bill to amend tenancy deposit regulations

Back to top

If you are a landlord, agent, advisor or tenant you will find more help and guidance on my main Landlord Law site. See also my online shop Your Law Store.

>> Follow this link to read our comments policy. If you have a landlord and tenant related problem please do not ask it here but use our >> Blog Clinic.

Comments close after three months.

One Response to Tenancy deposit protction – now only 30% failure
  1. Justin Palma
    September 15, 2009 | 10:32 pm

    On the one hand, it's great that this problem was cut in half, but on the other, 30% is still staggering!!!

    Very scary thought to know there is a 3 in 10 chance your Security Deposit could be squandered! That coupled with Landlords foreclosing on their Rental Properties, tenants should practically be allowed to run a Credit Check on their potential Landlords! lol




»

«
Recent posts:
Five ways for landlords to protect properties against fraudsters and criminals

Landlords need to be constantly vigilant as criminals are out there and targeting properties like y[more]

Is the landlord obliged to rehouse this tenant?

If a property is due to be demolished before the end of the fixed term, where does that leave the te[more]

How to interpret this confusing break clause?

Break clauses can be difficult to interpret and this is an example of a particularly confusing one. [more]

This week on School for Landlords I look at guarantee forms, when you should use them and how they w[more]

Can my tenants use the 3x deposits rule?

Here is a question to the blog clinic from Jay who is a landlord: Hi I protected the deposit within [more]

Landlord Law Blog roundup from 29 January

A big item of news this week was the launch of the Deposit Guard tenancy deposit scheme.  However a[more]

Can the landlord make a further deposit deduction?

Here is a question to the blog clinic from Andrew who is a tenant: I have, today, received an email [more]

Ben Reeve Lewis Friday Newsround #44

[In view of the snow, Ben Reeve Lewis has abandoned his Hawaiian shirt for a pair of slippers...[more]

How a landlord saved his tenant’s life

Sometimes it is good to check up on tenants - they may be in trouble and need help. [more]

Can a student be charged £100 for ending a tenancy early?

A student changes her mind after signing a tenancy agreement and agrees with the landlord that she w[more]