Sorry, comments are closed for this post.
The Landlord Law Newsletter, For landlords and letting agents, separate tenants version available
Join Ben and Tessa's Front Liner newsletter, for social housing workers
Here is a question to the blog clinic from Andrew who is a tenant: I have, today, received an email … [more]
[In view of the snow, Ben Reeve Lewis has abandoned his Hawaiian shirt for a pair of slippers...… [more]
Sometimes it is good to check up on tenants - they may be in trouble and need help. … [more]
A student changes her mind after signing a tenancy agreement and agrees with the landlord that she w… [more]
The big news at the moment is that there is a new tenancy deposit scheme for landlords which has bee… [more]
Looking this week at tenant information forms - what they are and how they can help you with your te… [more]
If the letting agent only ever protected part of the deposit paid, and then goes bust, how can you c… [more]
Landlords need to protect deposits. But they must serve a form giving prescribed information. Have … [more]
Powered by Headway, the drag and drop WordPress theme
Go To TopAdministration LoginCopyright © 2012 The Landlord Law Blog
The Landlord Law Blog from Tessa Shepperson
Tessa is an English solicitor who specialises in residential landlord and tenant law.
Tessa's legal services are provided via her online service Landlord Law. This service is provided as part of Tessa's legal practice TJ Shepperson, which is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority No 78852.
Note that any readers wishing to instruct Tessa professionally to do legal work, should do this via the Landlord Law service. Tessa's one-to-one legal work is now limited to the fixed fee services provided exclusively to Landlord Law annual members, plus Tessa also has a separate Lodger Landlord web-site with guidance for people taking in lodgers.
Tessa is a members of the Norfolk Independent Law Network, consisting of sole practitioner solicitors in Norfolk. She is also a director of Your Law Store
The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion. Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts. Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.
Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a solicitor-client relationship.
Please note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.
This blog was created by Gill Bishop using the Headway theme.
Helpful links from the Landlord Law site include the Which Tenancy Agreement Guide and the Landlords Tips and Tenants Tips
Foxtons withdraws appeal
The two articles that I have seen are on the PainSmith Blog and on Estate Agent Todays news page. I have not been able to find anything on the Foxtons site and a Google news search brings up little else. However both the sites quoted are pretty reliable so I think we can take it that the Foxtons appeal is off.
Speaking as a lawyer, this is a great shame as it would have been a good opportunity for the Court of Appeal to clarify the law, not only as to what sort of clauses (in particular clauses regarding renewal commission) are acceptable, but also perhaps with some guidance on the interpretation of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. We get too few cases on this.
The reason given for Foxtons’ decision is that they now have new terms and conditions which have satisfied the OFT. It seems that these provide for renewal commission, but only for two years and at a lower rate than the initial commission paid.
I have to say that does not sound unreasonable to me, as it is arguable that landlords are benefiting during those two years from the work done by the agent in finding a good tenant who stays on so the landlord does not have any voids. It was the open ended element of the previous clause which was so objectionable.
However, this does leave open the question of what do landlords who have paid commission in the past do now? The answer I suppose is that “it depends”. If the commission was charged by Foxtons under the clauses which were criticised by the Judge in the High Court decision, they should be entitled to a refund, and should contact Foxtons to ask for this.
However, as regards other claims, for example against other agents and differntly worded clauses, it will depend very much on the circumstances of the particular case. Commission charged in circumstances similar to those in the Foxtons case examples, may well be recoverable. However, if the renewal was at a lower rate and the clause was fully explained to the landlord before he signed, probably not.
It is an unsatisfactory aspect of our legal system, that clarification in the law is so often dependent upon whether a company is prepared or not to finance an appeal in circumstances where matters are unclear.
Related posts:
Back to top