Are you worried about your non paying tenants? >> Click here for our free guide

Urban Myth – landlords can take tenants property if they are in rent arrears

Urban MythIt is in many ways unfair. Here is a tenant, living in the landlords property and paying no rent,  The landlord meantime, still has pay the mortgage, is responsible for keeping the property in repair, and cannot repossess without getting a court order, which normally takes four to five months.

However, despite all this, a landlord is *not* entitled to go in and take the tenants possessions.  Not to sell, not to hold as security.    The car, the television set, the computer – they belong to the tenant, and the landlord has no rights over them.  If he takes them and sells them, this is both a civil wrong and a criminal offence.

There are certain situtions in law, where someone is entitled to a ‘lien‘ over someone eles’s property.  This means that they are entitled to hang on to it until they get paid.  Hotel owners, I understand, have a lien over guests luggage.  Solicitors have a lien over clients paperwork.  There are also liens, I believe, in aviation and maritime law.  However, so far as I am aware, landlords are not entitled to any lien over their tenants property, however much rent the tenant may owe.  Unfair perhaps, but true.

The only person who is entitled to seize and subsequently sell, another persons property, is a County Court Bailiff or High Court Sheriff, acting under a court order.

It is arguable perhaps that if the landlord takes the property, a tenant might find it difficult to recover it through the courts, as the landlord could counterclaim for his rent arrears, and seek to offset any damages awarded to the tenant against the rent arrears owed to him.  I am not sure however how successful this would be – and it is not a course of action which any lawyer would normally recommend.

Do you know of any ‘urban myths’? Or have you had any problems with this particular urban myth? Please post a comment if so, I would love to hear from you.

Click here to see all the Urban Myths.

Buffer

Important note. If you are reading an old post, remember that the law may have changed since it was written.




Landlord LawAre you a letting agent or property manager?


Its a risky business if you don’t properly understand the legal issues


Landlord Law>> Click here for some special & free services to help you


 From Landlord Law and Easy Law Training





If you have a landlord and tenant related question please do not ask it here but use our
>> Blog Clinic.

Comments close after three months. Please >> click here to read our comments policy

Page 1 of 11

4 Responses to Urban Myth – landlords can take tenants property if they are in rent arrears

  1. I have always liked this one. In a sense though it is less an urban myth than a misunderstanding. The right to take tenants goods against rent arrears is called distress and can be exercised in relation to commercial tenants. It just cannot be exercised in relation to the majority of residential tenants. I frequently find that this is a case of bad advice by lawyers who have studied commercial landlord and tenant law but not residential.

  2. Yes, I should have mentioned distress. Thank you.

    You used to be able to use distress against residential tenants with leave of the court (maybe you still can), but if you are gonig to all the trouble of applying to the court, you might as well go the whole way and apply for possession.

    Although about 20 years ago I did apply for distress as an experiement against some Rent Act tenants who were virtually unevictable, and it did perusade them to pay up! They soon fell into arrears again though.

  3. Hi Tessa, would it be possible to put something into the tenancy (or the lodger agreement if that’s the setup) which gave the landlord a lien?

  4. Interesting question. In a normal tenancy probably not. The reason being that the tenancy will, in most cases, be subject to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, and these regulations provide (more or less) that if there is a clause which changes a tenants legal rights to the tenants detriment, this will normally be void.

    A lodger agreement would probably be OK, as in most cases the landlord would not be acting in the course of a business, so the regulations would not apply. However as some lodger landlords may take in lodgers as a business, I don’t think it is something that could go in an agreement which was going on sale.

    What do other lawyers think?




»

«

About the post author:

Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is a lawyer specialising in residential landlord and tenant law. She runs the Landlord Law website (now in its 12th year) and is a director of Easy Law Training Ltd and Your Law Store. Tessa also sits on the Property Redress Scheme Council. When not working she enjoys reading, cooking and messing around on the computer. You can also find her on Google



The Landlord Law Blog from Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is an English lawyer specialising in residential landlord and tenant law.


Legal Services

Legal services are provided via Tessa's online service Landlord Law. Some advice services are provided by Tessa, other legal services are provided by specialist housing firm Anthony Gold.


Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion. Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts. Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.


Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a solicitor-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).


Guest bloggers

Please note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.


Other websites from Tessa

Lodger Landlord | Google+ | Your Law Store | Google | Landlord Law facebook page | How to Evict Your Tenant website | the Which Tenancy Agreement Guide | Landlords Tips | Tenants Tips | Working on the Web | Landlord Law Store