<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Section 21 possession notices &#8211; at last a sensible decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2010/03/22/section-21-possession-notices-at-last-a-sensible-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2010/03/22/section-21-possession-notices-at-last-a-sensible-decision/</link>
	<description>From landlord and tenant solicitor Tessa Shepperson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:12:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessa Shepperson</title>
		<link>http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2010/03/22/section-21-possession-notices-at-last-a-sensible-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-1958</link>
		<dc:creator>Tessa Shepperson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/?p=2047#comment-1958</guid>
		<description>True, but if there have been anything in the defendants argument, no doubt the appeal would have been allowed.  Which is significant and something which will no doubt be of interest to a Judge when considering a similar point, given the dearth of case law on this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but if there have been anything in the defendants argument, no doubt the appeal would have been allowed.  Which is significant and something which will no doubt be of interest to a Judge when considering a similar point, given the dearth of case law on this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2010/03/22/section-21-possession-notices-at-last-a-sensible-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-1957</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/?p=2047#comment-1957</guid>
		<description>Readers should also be aware that Elias is, of course, only a permission decision and so not normally capable of being cited in court (even if we at NL covered it as well!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Readers should also be aware that Elias is, of course, only a permission decision and so not normally capable of being cited in court (even if we at NL covered it as well!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

