Introducing the Landlord Law Podcasts

Kevin FirthFirst Guest – Kevin Firth of the DPS

A new initiative for the new year is my podcast series.  I’m hoping to do one per month and I have some great guests lined up for you.

To tell you a bit more (and to practice with the audio equipment) I have done a short audio which you can listen to, explaining a bit more about it.  Turn your sound up and click the little arrow to start it.  You’ll hear our theme music first.

[audio:http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Series_announce.mp3|titles=Series_announce]

You can read Kevins NPP post here.

Questions are now closed for the podcast, thank you to everyone who submitted a question.

About the author

Tessa Shepperson Tessa is a solicitor and specialises in residential landlord and tenant law. She runs the Landlord Law website (now in its 11th year) and is also a director of Easy Law Training Ltd and Your Law Store. When not working she enjoys reading, cooking and messing around on the computer. You can also find her on Google



Buffer

>> Back to the top


How to Evict Your Tenant
Are you thinking of evicting your tenant?
Are you confused about what to do?

>> Click here for free online help
>> Follow this link to read our comments policy. If you have a landlord and tenant related question please do not ask it here but use our >> Blog Clinic.

Comments close after three months.

7 Responses to Introducing the Landlord Law Podcasts
  1. Tom Hiskey, probate lawyer
    January 9, 2011 | 4:31 pm

    Hi Tessa,

    Great intro to your forthcoming podcast series. I look forward to it. Catchy tune too!

    Tom, from The Law Wizard

  2. Do you have any questions for The DPS?
    January 30, 2011 | 12:35 pm

    [...] can submit questions here on The DPS Blog, or fill in Tessa’s online form but make sure you’ve sent us your questions by Saturday 15 January so they can be [...]

  3. Lisa Laisney
    May 17, 2011 | 9:37 am

    Hi
    I am a land lord who currently is in dispute with a tenant who owes me over £2500 in rent arrears. He is out of the property now.
    I have spent over £2000 in legal fees trying to evict them and taking them to court for the rent arrears. I was informed by my solicitor not to preceed as the chance of getting the money back was nil. I discountinued court action, knowing that the only money I may get back was the £675 in the DPS. The tenant has disputed the return of the money to me. He has suspended the account will not use the ADR service and I have been told that the only way I can get this money back is through a court order. I have asked the DPS how long this money can stay there before I can make a claim and they have said indefinately. I thought after 5 years – which is the standard time for all financial matters would apply here, not so.
    The tenant cannot supply any evidence that he is NOT in rent arrears, so really what he is doing is if he can’t have the money then he won’t let me have it out of spite.
    This couple have done this before, he has made my life a misery taking picture of my cars, property, and intimidating my family etc.
    What can I do? Go through the expense of the court process again – wasting more money to get £675 back. I really need some help -as I feel there is no one on the side of decent good land lords. I have asked the DPS for a freedom of information request on the amounts of money in their accounts for similar situations and money unclaimed. There is alot more to this, but have just given you a basic outline
    Lisa Laisney

  4. Tessa Shepperson
    May 17, 2011 | 10:08 am

    Hello Lisa, £2,000 sound rather high for eviction for rent arrears – see this post here http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2010/12/22/how-to-evict-your-tenant-on-a-shoestring-budget/. I will see if I can get Kevin to comment on this.

  5. Tessa Shepperson
    May 18, 2011 | 9:27 am

    Lisa, I have contacted the DPS about your problem and this is the response which they have asked me to put online for you:

    “I do understand your frustrations but unfortunately the information given to you is correct. The DPS must have consent from both parties that they are happy to use the ADR service; without agreement from your tenant, the only way to retrieve the £675 deposit is through the Courts.”

    I am sorry that this is not the answer you would like but the DPS are bound by their rules.

  6. Kevin FIrth
    May 18, 2011 | 11:35 am

    Hi Tessa,

    Just to clarify, it isn’t a DPS rule that both parties have to consent to use the ADR service, its a provision in Schedule 10 of the Housing Act.

    Thanks

    Kevin

  7. Tessa Shepperson
    May 18, 2011 | 11:47 am

    So you see Lisa, its not even their own rules! So there is not much that can be done about it.




»

«
Recent posts:
What should landlords watch out for when doing inspections?

I am asked what landlords should watch out for when doing suggestios and ask for your comments[more]

A tenant has money deducted from her bank account by way of a penalty for rent arrears at a time whe[more]

I am interviewed by Property Geek

Just a quick heads up to let you know that I was recently interviewed by Property Geek and the inter[more]

Residential Possession Proceedings by Gary Webber and Daniel Dovar

A review of Residential Possession Proceedings by Gary Webber - an essential reference book for all [more]

Here is a question to the blog clinic from Barbara (not her real name): Some individuals in our stre[more]

Ben’s  Public Eye  #1

Ben Reeve Lewis turns his eye on social housing issues in the first of a new monthly series. This w[more]

Three misunderstanding about tenants rights when a section 21 notice is served on them

Tenants often panic when a section 21 notice is served on them. Hopefully this post will provide so[more]

Possession notices - should you serve by recorded delivery or by the ordinary post? A Landlord Law [more]

Looking at some interpretation issues of the Housing Act 2004 in connection with resolving claims fo[more]

Tenants have deducted a full months rent after a series of minor problems at their property. Are th[more]