Are you worried about your non paying tenants? >> Click here for our free guide

Judge error causing landlords delay and expense

Judge errorI was a bit startled to learn from a loyal Landlord Law Blog reader recently, that quite a few people on landlord forums (such as the LandlordZone forum) have been complaining about Judge error.

Specifically Judges chucking out cases on the basis that the section 21 notice is wrong because it does not give the last day of a period of the tenancy as the expiry date (required for periodic tenancies under s21(4)), when in fact the the notice was served during a fixed term when this requirement does not apply (s21(1)).

The landlord then has to apply to reinstate the proceedings (form N244) which costs him £80.  Needless to say they are pretty upset at this additional delay and cost when their claim was in fact completely correct from the start.

Indeed this sort of Judge’s error could prove extremely  expensive for landlords whose tenants are not paying rent, as it will probably mean an extra couple of months rent lost before they can recover possession and re-let to a paying tenant.

Pre-empting letter

My suggestion for landlords acting in person, to prevent this happening, is to do a covering letter with the application form (which needs to be sent by post as you cannot use PCOL for the accelerated procedure) just pointing out that the notice is served pursuant to s21(1) and that therefore the notice does not need to end at the end of a period of the tenancy.

It is a bit much though to expect landlords to have to pre-empt Judge error in this way!

Requesting a review by letter

My other thought is that if the Judge is plainly wrong, can they request the court to refer the case back to the Judge WITHOUT applying under N244 and paying the fee?

I can remember at least one case in the past where I have asked (by letter) for a case to be referred back to the Judge when they got things wrong.  This was done and the order was then rectified.  This was quite a few years ago though and maybe courts are now refusing to do this.

It is a pretty unsatisfactory state of affairs anyway.  Have you had this problem?  I wonder how widespread it really is.

Buffer

Important note. If you are reading an old post, remember that the law may have changed since it was written.




Landlord LawAre you a letting agent or property manager?


Its a risky business if you don’t properly understand the legal issues


Landlord Law>> Click here for some special & free services to help you


 From Landlord Law and Easy Law Training





If you have a landlord and tenant related question please do not ask it here but use our
>> Blog Clinic.

Comments close after three months. Please >> click here to read our comments policy

Page 1 of 11

11 Responses to Judge error causing landlords delay and expense

  1. I’m surprised by that too Tessa. Maybe I just get good judges.

    On a couple of occasions I have simply asked the judge for permission to appeal their decision. In both cases we had to go down to the listings office and pay for a new hearing but also in both cases we were in front of another judge the same day.

    Maybe a good point to add to your landlord law course – make sure the judge understands the service requirement and bring the relevant section to the judge’s attention if they get it wrong. People often think they cant chalenge a judge’s decision in court. You can but you have to do it respectfully and profesionally. I know….I have the scars from the days before I learnt that!

  2. The trouble is Ben, for the accelerated procedure you are not there. The Judge makes the decision on the paperwork without a hearing.

    So the landlord does not have an opportunity to say “Er, excuse me, that notice was served under s21(1)”.

    Which makes it all the more unfair.

  3. On requesting it by letter, technically a final order can’t be changed that way. A letter will only do for requesting correction of an error under the ‘slip rule’ CPR 40.12 which is for typos and such like. While such a judgment may be wrong, it is not an error for CPR 40.12.

  4. I agree with both! Technically, yes, once an order is made that finally disposes of the case, that cannot be recalled by the Judge. But I have seen it done (not that often, I’m pleased to say) and my view is that if the right outcome is reached with the minimum of costs and no prejudice to the other side, what harm is done? It must be worth a try anyway – and hopefully you are providing free training for the judiciary while you’re at it.

  5. Thank you both for your comments. The trouble is I suppose, that it is far less likely to happen to us, as Judges will presumably check a bit more carefully if a solicitor or barrister has drafted up the paperwork.

    I agree 100% with the idea that things should be done with minimum cost and bother. However I worry that Courts will be under pressure to increase court fee income as much as possible, so will be less flexible about things than they were.

  6. Whilst there is no excuse for county court judges confusing the requirements of section 21(1) with those of section 21(4), the real culprit is section 21 itself which is a complete pig’s ear. Why have different lengths of notice? Why the need to specify the end of a tenancy period in a section 21(4) notice when the notice does not bring the tenancy to an end? In a section 21(4) notice you need to refer to the section, but in a section 21(1) notice you do not. And so on. Needs an overhaul.

  7. @Lawcruncher Very true. Practically everyone in the property and legal business has been saying that for years.

    The Law Commission recommended this be changed in their 2006 Renting Homes report but nothing was done about it.

  8. “if the Judge is plainly wrong” then you “reinstate the proceedings (form N244)” prove that you was right in first place and ask for a refund of monies for N244. No?
    Seems logical to me, if they will that’s a different question.

    But I am replying because, You said “you cannot use PCOL for the accelerated procedure”, not at all? for Accelerated you have to use “snail mail” and not on-line?

  9. On my earlier comment………….I feel such a fool. Enthusiasm got the better of me:)

    But yes. I have never understood the daft difference between the 2 section 21s. If you hold them up side by side they look identical, apart from the small print at the top.

    There are rarely problems with a 21 (1) b;, only the 21 (4) a:.

    Is there a sound legal reasons why there are extra requirements for S21s on a periodic tenancy Tessa?

  10. The difference between the two figures will give you the amount of your delay, and a comparison between that delay and the planned amount of time will lead you to the percent delay.




»

«

About the post author:

Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is a lawyer specialising in residential landlord and tenant law. She runs the Landlord Law website (now in its 12th year) and is a director of Easy Law Training Ltd and Your Law Store. Tessa also sits on the Property Redress Scheme Council. When not working she enjoys reading, cooking and messing around on the computer. You can also find her on Google



The Landlord Law Blog from Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is an English lawyer specialising in residential landlord and tenant law.


Legal Services

Legal services are provided via Tessa's online service Landlord Law. Some advice services are provided by Tessa, other legal services are provided by specialist housing firm Anthony Gold.


Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion. Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts. Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.


Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a solicitor-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).


Guest bloggers

Please note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.


Other websites from Tessa

Lodger Landlord | Google+ | Your Law Store | Google | Landlord Law facebook page | How to Evict Your Tenant website | the Which Tenancy Agreement Guide | Landlords Tips | Tenants Tips | Working on the Web | Landlord Law Store