Financial awards for rat and mouse infestation

ratI was flicking through the January edition of Legal Action Magazine today (yes I know, I am a bit late getting around to it) when my eye was caught by a couple of cases in the disrepair section featuring rodent related awards.

We often get tenants complaining to the Blog Clinic about rats and mice – well here are a couple of cases where tenants received financial compensation.

Both were made on counterclaims brought by tenants whose landlords were trying to evict them for rent arrears.

Frederick v. Simpson v. Frame

Willesden County Court, 11 July 2011

Here the tenant had an AST of a room in a shared house. The tenant brought a counterclaim to the landlords possession claim based on disrepair which she had suffered since she first moved into the property in November 2009.

The Judge found for the tenant and made an award based on a diminution of the value of the rent throughout the tenancy of 65%:

  • 30% for lack of hot water
  • 15% for lack of heating in the common parts,
  • 15% for (wait for it) a mouse infestation – largely to the common parts, and
  • 5% for miscellaneous matters

The award came to £7,417 and £131 interest. Easily offsetting the £5,752 alleged rent arrears. The landlords were also ordered to do remedial works within three months.

Harwood Properties v. Remuinan

Brighton County Court, 18 October 2011

Here the tenant, again, counterclaimed a possession claim for disrepair from the start of her tenancy from May 2010. The Judge found the landlords liable for:

  • Breach of an express agreement to clean the carpets and decorate the walls
  • Sewage on the patio for two months, with further leakage and smells for a further 14 months
  • A leaking toilet
  • Cracked bath sealant which led to water leakage
  • Leaking bathroom tap and defective patio door, AND
  • A rat infestation from February to August 2011

Taking all this into account the Judge awarded

  • 20% of the rent throughout the tenancy for general damages plus
  • an additional 20% for the period of the rat infestation.

Once again the award to the tenant, £2,816 outweighed the agreed rent arrears of £940.78.

Mouse money

So if your property has a rodent problem, this could equate to an award of between 15 and 20% off the rent.

But don’t just knock it off the rent – you are only actually entitled to this if you have had a court case and the Judge has made an award.

Remember also that you are not going to get this sort of award if you just see a mouse once on the patio.  These were both serious infestations.  In fact in the second case, the Judge considered the rat problem to be more distressing than all the others.  So be realisitic.

Rat picture by Charles Jeffrey Danoff

About the author

Tessa Shepperson Tessa is a solicitor and specialises in residential landlord and tenant law. She runs the Landlord Law website (now in its 11th year) and is also a director of Easy Law Training Ltd and Your Law Store. When not working she enjoys reading, cooking and messing around on the computer. You can also find her on Google



Buffer

>> Back to the top


How to Evict Your Tenant
Are you thinking of evicting your tenant?
Are you confused about what to do?

>> Click here for free online help
>> Follow this link to read our comments policy. If you have a landlord and tenant related question please do not ask it here but use our >> Blog Clinic.

Comments close after three months.

2 Responses to Financial awards for rat and mouse infestation
  1. Bernie Dunne
    May 21, 2012 | 3:40 pm

    The problem of rodent infestation is a common one, but I feel tenants should be made aware that they must ensure that all discarded foodstuffs are properly disposed of and that they ensure no unnecessary rubbish is left lying around to attract the vermin.

  2. Ben Reeve-Lewis
    May 21, 2012 | 7:13 pm

    I had a recent conversation with one of our environmental health officers about the difference between rat and mouse infestation.

    He said rats are often caused by broken sewers, so food left exposed will not solve the problem.

    On mice he said that the main issue for them was whether the mice were getting in through a structural fault, which would be the responsibility of the the landlord or whether it was down to the way the tenant uses the property.

    His words were “No structural fault? them them is your mice”……




»

«
Recent posts:
Ben  Reeve Lewis Friday newsround #107

Ben Reeve Lewis looking at online jobseekers, moving families out of London and having your cake and[more]

What should landlords watch out for when doing inspections?

I am asked what landlords should watch out for when doing suggestios and ask for your comments[more]

A tenant has money deducted from her bank account by way of a penalty for rent arrears at a time whe[more]

I am interviewed by Property Geek

Just a quick heads up to let you know that I was recently interviewed by Property Geek and the inter[more]

Residential Possession Proceedings by Gary Webber and Daniel Dovar

A review of Residential Possession Proceedings by Gary Webber - an essential reference book for all [more]

Here is a question to the blog clinic from Barbara (not her real name): Some individuals in our stre[more]

Ben’s  Public Eye  #1

Ben Reeve Lewis turns his eye on social housing issues in the first of a new monthly series. This w[more]

Three misunderstanding about tenants rights when a section 21 notice is served on them

Tenants often panic when a section 21 notice is served on them. Hopefully this post will provide so[more]

Looking at some interpretation issues of the Housing Act 2004 in connection with resolving claims fo[more]

Tenants have deducted a full months rent after a series of minor problems at their property. Are th[more]