Massive extra costs to social housing providers identified by Southwark’s direct payment benefits test

Southwark CathedralPrivate landlords have for some time had to put up with the rules which provide for payment to go direct to the tenants. Only in two circumstances -

  • where the tenant is deemed ‘vulnerable’ (which has to be specially applied for) or
  • if the tenant is over 8 weeks in arrears of rent

will payment be made to the landlord direct.

Social housing providers have, until now, still had payment made direct to them in the majority of cases. However with the benefit changes planned by the government, this is set to change.

The reasoning behind this is to ‘empower’ tenants by getting them to take responsibility for their lives and financial affairs.

However, as a benefit manager I was listening to at a talk last night rightly pointed out, for persons with chaotic lifestyles, there are better ways of training them to manage their finances than giving them a large sum of money once a month.

Southwark’s project has been focusing on what actually happens in this situation. Here are their findings:

  • Only 60 per cent of the tenants identified for the pilot were successfully moved onto the scheme
  • There is a lack of understanding about personal finance among some tenants and some were unable to obtain a bank account
  • 11 per cent of those originally identified for the pilot refused or were unable to engage with the council, and 14 per cent were later deemed too vulnerable to take part

Following on from this, Southwark estimate that when direct payment is borough wide, their rent arrears could increase by 14 million, with extra administration costs of £400,000.

Cllr Richard Livingstone said

What has been exposed by our pilot is that social landlords are likely to face such high levels of debt that direct payments could bring social housing as we know it to an end

A worrying prospect.

Private landlords are unlikely to want to take up the slack. Already they are fleeing from benefit tenants like the wind, and even those prepared to consider the idea may well find their their mortgage lender prohibits it.

Worrying times indeed. You can read more about the project here.

Southwark Cathedral picture from flickr

About the author

Tessa Shepperson Tessa is a solicitor and specialises in residential landlord and tenant law. She runs the Landlord Law website (now in its 11th year) and is also a director of Easy Law Training Ltd and Your Law Store. When not working she enjoys reading, cooking and messing around on the computer. You can also find her on Google



Buffer

>> Back to the top


How to Evict Your Tenant
Are you thinking of evicting your tenant?
Are you confused about what to do?

>> Click here for free online analysis
>> Follow this link to read our comments policy. If you have a landlord and tenant related question please do not ask it here but use our >> Blog Clinic.

Comments close after three months.

2 Responses to Massive extra costs to social housing providers identified by Southwark’s direct payment benefits test
  1. JamieT
    February 28, 2013 | 9:26 am

    Welcome to the real world social landlords! Now you’ll appreciate what private landlords who accept social tenants have had to put up with.

  2. Ben Reeve Lewis
    February 28, 2013 | 9:35 am

    This should be no surprise to anyone Tessa. Nobody with any common sense needed the 5 pilots to tell us this.

    How does simply dumping several pounds a week into someone’s bank account suddenly make them good with money? Of course the argument is that they will need to learn, but what happens while they are learning and making mistakes? (which is part of the learning process)

    At a time when we need more housing than ever the housing association that my sister works for in Hampshire has cancelled its entire new build programme in anticipation of the chaos being caused by spiralling rent arrears.

    When this was first mooted by government I was training some experienced council housing officers in Wales and explained it to them. One officer looked stunned and said simply “We’re finished if they do that”. Indeed sir.

    Whereas PRS landlords solved the problem by walking away from tenants on benefits social landlords have no so such luxury.

    The thing is, will repossessions rise or will county courts, as many do now, merely refuse to grant warrants and tell the social landlord they will have to find an alternative.
    Ben Reeve Lewis recently posted..John Murray joins Easy Law ‘face2face’ training teamMy Profile

*** When posting a comment, you are advised to keep a copy (particularly if it is a long comment) just in case there is any problem when you click submit ***
Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

CommentLuv badge
Trackback URL http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2013/02/28/massive-extra-costs-to-social-housing-providers-identified-by-southwarks-direct-payment-benefits-test/trackback/



»

«
Recent posts:
Ben’s  Public Eye  #1

Ben Reeve Lewis turns his eye on social housing issues in the first of a new monthly series. This w[more]

Three misunderstanding about tenants rights when a section 21 notice is served on them

Tenants often panic when a section 21 notice is served on them. Hopefully this post will provide so[more]

Possession notices - should you serve by recorded delivery or by the ordinary post? A Landlord Law [more]

Looking at some interpretation issues of the Housing Act 2004 in connection with resolving claims fo[more]

Tenants have deducted a full months rent after a series of minor problems at their property. Are th[more]

Ben Reeve Lewis Friday newsround #106

Ben is a bit surprised that landlords are going to be expected to turn into immigration officers bea[more]

Tenants insisting on using unsafe boiler after gas check

What should you do if your tenants insist on using a boiler which the annual gas inspection has show[more]

Living in a box – are container homes a good idea?

Help for would be tenants. Container homes for the homeless - are they a good idea? An innovative i[more]

Questions about using section 21

Two questions about section 21 - when you serve the notice on a tenant and what you can do about sui[more]

Ben Reeve Lewis Friday newsround #105

Ben can't speak at the moment but he can still write ...[more]