Sign up for my Weekly Tips on a Tuesday (and get a free guide)>> Click here

Landlord and tenant sky dish fiasco

Sky dishA question to the blog clinic from John (not his real name) about sky satellite dishes:

I share a flat with two other people, when we moved we asked the agent if we could have sky installed, meaning a dish would be attached to the wall at the back.

The agent said the landlord had no issue with it as long as it did not ‘infringe on other people’s property’. It did not so we went ahead and signed up to an 18 month contract.

Two weeks later we had a letter from the estate managers saying we didn’t have permission to have the dish installed and ordered us to take it down. We told them we had the consent of the landlord but they said that the landlord should have told us that dishes are not permitted.

We told the agent but they backtracked and said they couldn’t intervene, their feeble defence was a disclaimer at the bottom of their email which states they cannot be held responsible for advice given by email.

The estate managers have told us that if the dish is not removed in the next 14 days, they will arrange for it to be removed themselves and the cost passed to the landlord. In the meantime, we have a contract of £60 a month for something we cannot use.

We accept the dish has to be removed so we asked for £60 off our rent for the next 15 months, or a full month rent free (£990) so we can cancel the contract with sky outright. The agent did not respond so we have asked for the landlord’s address but this was also ignored. We have written a formal complaint to the agent but this has not been acknowledged either.

We are very angry about this and feel we have been let down by both the agent and the landlord. Are we entitled to deduct the money from our rent? We have kept the email confirming we could put the dish up, and all the other emails we have sent to the agent.

We think we have a legitimate case for compensation and hope that you may be able to give some advice.

There is an argument that the landlord is liable to you if you asked permission and was granted this.

My only caveat is his statement that the installation must not impinge on other people’s property. As it turns out the sky dish installation was not allowed – would this warning be deemed to be putting you on alert to check this further?

I am inclined to think not, particularly if it would have been hard for you to find out about the ban.

The agent by the way is not personally liable, as they were simply acting in their capacity as agent for the landlord, so any claim must be made against the landlord himself.

Getting the landlords address

The agents are obliged to provide his address if you ask – this is set out in s1 Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 – and it is a criminal offence if they fail to comply.

So to start with, you need to send them a formal letter requesting the landlords address – and say that this request is made pursuant to a1 Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 so there can be no mistake!

Making a claim

Neither the landlord not the agent are going to want you to deduct the Sky charges from your rent.  However if you threaten proceedings they may agree to this – or they may not.  Its hard to tell.

Assuming you have a case (and I think you probably have) one way to deal with it is to simply deduct the rent and leave them to sue you for it.

However note that they will probably be able to deduct this from your deposit when you leave, and this sort of dispute is not something the tenancy deposit adjudicators can deal with.  So you would want your dispute to be dealt with in the courts.

Another approach of course would be to deduct the deposit sum from your last months rent.  You are not supposed to do this of course, but it would mean that it would be up to the landlord to sue you for the money relating to the Sky contract, rather than up to you to sue them.

If you actually went to court, the question then is whether your case would succeed and if so, how much the Judge would award.  I think you have a reasonably good chance of success but no litigation is 100% certain.

So far as the amount of your award is concerned, this would depend to a certain extent on what you told the agents at the time you asked for permission.  So if you said you would be applying for an 18 month contract, it is arguable that they are liable to refund you on this basis.

However if you did not actually say this, then compensation would probably be on the basis of a normal 12 month contract.  In either case, the Judge would expect you to reach agreement with Sky to minimise your claim as much as possible.

This story is also a lesson to landlord to be more careful what they agree to grant permission for!

(See also the comments area below and >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy)

Important note. If you are reading an old post, remember that the law may have changed since it was written.

Landlord LawLandlord Law exists to give help & support to landlords

To find out more and the Seven Free Services you can use on Landlord Law RIGHT NOW!

>> Click Here

6 Responses to Landlord and tenant sky dish fiasco

  1. As they’ve said it was 2 weeks later, could you not call sky and cancel if it’s within 1 month of signing?

    Or arrange for sky to come out again and install a dish in an alternative location. Never hurts to call them and explain your difficult situation and see what they can offer!

  2. An interesting case. However it does raise the question of how long the AST has to run if fixed, or indeed if a SPT. Surely the agent and or landlord should have been aware of this. If for example it was a SPT, then why an 18 month agreement. If a Section 21 has issued, would the tenant claim the remainder of their 18 month Sky contract?

  3. @Peter The landlord and agent have clearly not dealt with this properly – they should have said no!

    But it was a reasonable question for the tenant to ask.

    I think that as the dish had to be taken down immediately as it was forbidden, the tenant will probably have a claim against the landlord. However this would be different if the tenant was (for example) being evicted for rent arrears or as you say, under a s21 notice.

    We are not told how long the fixed term is for – presumably it was for at least 18 months or the tenant is being a bit silly in signing up for a longer period!

  4. I popped on here to make a comment but can see you have made the same point… I imagine the tenancy agreement would have been a standard 12 months agreement so there would already have been an issue with the remaining 6 months and a hefty charge for cancelling the broadband when the tenants vacate, no doubt.

  5. Hi Guys
    I have had problems like this myself in the thing I have learned from my mistakes and mistakes by others is to get every single thing in writing,as verbal agreements do not mean a lot any more.
    I purchased a wireless camera only last week,and found after installing it the transmitter was the wrong one supplied,when I contacted the supply he said I sold you what you asked for period.

    After scrolling through all my emails I found one email that asked the supplier was this transmitter the correct one for the wireless distance he replied yes it is fine,
    just by getting this email from him
    it was plain to see they had advised me to purchase the wrong product, as a result they compensated me for time and material

    I know ive gone on a bit but always ask a question and get it confirmed by email



About the post author:

Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is a lawyer and specialises in creating products and services which help landlords and letting agents learn and understand landlord & tenant law. For example, she runs the Landlord Law website (now in its 14th year) and is a director of Easy Law Training Ltd and Your Law Store. Tessa also sits on the Property Redress Scheme Council. When not working she enjoys reading, cooking and messing around on the computer. You can also find her on Google

The Landlord Law Blog from Tessa Shepperson

Tessa is an English lawyer specialising in residential landlord and tenant law.

Legal Services

Legal services are provided via Tessa's online service Landlord Law. Some advice services are provided by Tessa, other legal services are provided by specialist housing firm Anthony Gold.


The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion. Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts. Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Guest bloggers

Please note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Other websites from Tessa

Lodger Landlord | Google+ | Your Law Store | How to Evict Your Tenant website | the Which Tenancy Agreement Guide | Landlords Tips | Tenants Tips | Landlord Law Store