This is a question I have been asked by a loyal reader. Which is not an easy one to answer. There are a plethora of laws and regulations to consider.
But first, you may be asking –
What are white goods?
‘White goods’ is the name normally used for those kitchen appliances which are usually white – washing machines, fridges, dishwashers – that sort of thing.
In a rented property they are normally provided by the landlord. But if they break down – who is responsible for dealing with this?
The Civil law:
As I have discussed before, there are two systems of law – civil and criminal, so we need to look at landlords obligations in both. Lets look at the civil law first.
Section 11 of the LTA, and SOGSA 1982
First lets take a look at the landlords repairing covenants in s11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985. Although this refers to installations for the supply of various services, this generally means things like pipes and wiring, or heaters and water boilers.
So it will not include things like fridges and washing machines. Indeed this is actually stated in s11(1)(b): “but not other fixtures, fittings and appliances for making use of the supply of water, gas or electricity”
There are also obligations in the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 which require any items provided to be of ‘satisfactory quality’.
Contractual obligations
If s11 is not applicable, your tenancy agreement is the first place you should look if you want to know what your rights are.
Some tenancy agreements will specifically state that it is the landlords obligation to deal with problems with equipment provided, so long as the problem was not caused by the tenant.
Although often landlords will deal with the repairs even if the tenant caused the damage but will expect to be reimbursed for the cost – eg out of the deposit when the tenant leaves.
Enforcing civil law rights
This is normally done via a claim in the county court – although the court will expect the parties to have tried to resolve the issues first.
If you think you have a civil claim, it is best to seek legal advice before taking legal action.
Criminal law:
These are various obligations on landlords which fall under the criminal jurisdiction – these are administered largely by local authorities (NOT the police).
Consumer safety regulations
I think if there is going to be a general obligation under law on landlords for the maintenance of white goods it will fall in this area. For example there are the Electrical Safety Regulations 1994.
I have a feeling that there is another general consumer safety statutory instrument which would apply here but cannot bring it to mind (and a quick search has not helped) – if you know what it is please leave a comment.
If the white good is in any way a ‘gas appliance’ then the landlord will be responsible for the repair under the Gas Regulations.
The HHSRS
This is the Housing Health and Safety Rating System administered by Local Authority Environmental Health Depts. Properties are assessed for safety against 29 ‘hazards’.
I don’t have a list of these in front if me while writing this, but at least one of these will relate to dangerous electrical equipment.
So if an inspection shows that the property and its contents are in a dangerous condition so as to constitute a hazard, then the landlord will be asked to deal with it, and be served an improvement notice if he does not.
Enforcing landlords duties under the criminal law
You cannot normally do this yourself – so you need to report the issue to the relevant authority. They will then (if they think the situation warrants it) deal with the enforcement.
For most situations you visit your local authority tenancy relations or housing officer, or environmental health dept.
However for gas appliances, you need to speak to your local Health and Safety Executive. For consumer safety legislation, speak to your local Trading Standards office.
Tenants obligations
It is sometimes forgotten that tenants have duties too. Way back in the 1950’s Lord Denning pointed out that tenants have a duty to be good householders and to do the little things about the house that stop the big problems happening. For example replacing washers in taps and so on.
So it is arguable that this would include things like replacing lights in fridges and cleaning out the filters in washing machines and so on.
If they don’t do this and the appliance break down as a result – it will be their fault and they will be responsible for the cost of repair.
The sensible approach
In most landlord / tenant situations things are dealt with amicably. Tenants will treat appliances with respect and follow manufacturers instructions (which will have been provided by the landlord).
When there is a breakdown, landlords will get things done because they want to make sure that contractors working on their appliances are people they have approved and are working to a good standard.
If there is any dispute, landlords and tenants will come to a resolution because they are both reasonable people and just want to get things sorted.
It is MUCH better in a landlord and tenant situation to resolve things in an amicable, fair and sensible manner between yourselves, rather than to start looking up the law and citing statutes.
If this is necessary then it probably means the the landlord / tenant relationship bas broken down and you may want to think of moving on.
If you can of course …
Hi Tessa, The gas safety regs (1998 I think) and Part P Electrical Regs are only concerned with installation and safety and not whether appliances are working or not working. A landlord may be committing an offence if a warning Notice has been attached to an unsafe gas appliance and the landlord removes it or if a capped supply is reconnected. Providing appliances are not being used the Gas & Electrical Regs cannot be used. If a property is an HMO then the 2004 Housing Act Management Regs may be used to ensure that the property has adequate kitchen equipment for the number of tenants. The regs are implemented by the Council.
Otherwise, as you say it is down to the contract but in reality court enforcement might not be feasible unless perhaps a court can be persuaded to issue an injunction. I doubt Legal Help would be likely for a claim.
Hi Colin, thanks for that. Presumably if something is not working it will be dangerous to try (for example to switch it on), which is why I generally assume that landlords are responsble for all gas related repairs.
I totally agree with you about court action, hence my final paragraphs!
From next month, replacement of (most)white goods will no longer be tax deductable for landlords.
I expect we will see a dramatic reduction in landlords providing them.
-among the landlords that pay tax of course!
Colin Lunt is correct that gas/electrical safety laws do not imply an obligation to repair; it is enough that an appliance is safe, whether it’s in working order or not.
In the vast majority of cases, I would imagine the question is one of civil, not criminal, liability. A washing machine breaks down; the tenant demands its repair, but the contract is silent. The tenant nevertheless thinks, well, the landlord provided the w/machine, so he *must* be obliged to repair it – there must, in other words, be some sort of implied contractual obligation.
Section 11 LTA 1985 is effectively inserted into all (qualifying) tenancy contracts. It expressly specifies that the landlord is not responsible for kitchen appliance repairs. That’s the starting position.
Quoting from a 1996 Law Commission report: ‘In general, the landlord will be contractually liable to the tenant only where he has expressly undertaken an obligation to repair or maintain the property. “It is well established that, in the absence of agreement to the contrary, the law imposes no obligations on a landlord to keep the demised premises in repair” [Hart v Windsor 1843]’
Elsewhere, the report states: ‘There is a presumption against the implication of any repairing obligation in a lease; there may therefore be cases where neither party is obliged to repair all or some part of the premises that are leased.’
Therefore, in the case of the tenant with the broken washing machine, there would have to be an express term in the contract, specifying that the landlord *is* responsible for appliance repairs, in order to override the terms implied by s.11.
In short, if the contract is silent on the matter, then IMO neither party is legally liable for the repair.
Having read all the other comments. The law may not specifically declare who is responsible, but if the landlord has supplied white goods then surely there is an implied contract that he will repair them. If a property is advertised with certain items (i.e. washing machine) this falls under the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.
I would also suggest that in the event that an appliance fails and the tenant is forced to replace it using their own money then the new appliance is theirs and they can take it when they leave.
If we are talking strictly only about repairs, again I would argue that a tenant has the right to reclaim money if the landlord fails to carry out a repair. I would be interested to know if any deposit tribunal adjudications have ruled on such a case?
Totally agree with gas appliances, if it does not work and there is no need for repair or replacement – get it capped.