Our regular guest blogger Ben Reeve-Lewis puts his thinking cap on.
Protected tenancies
After posting a few bits and pieces on Tessa’s site I was thinking about how much we all talk about Assured Shorthold Tenancies and Assured Tenancies, but did you know there are around 16 or so different tenancies out there?
I wanted to give you all a heads up on Protected Tenancies. “What the hell are they”? you all shout Some people I meet say “Oh those. But there aren’t any of those left are there?”……….Yes, Loads comes my reply.
Protected tenancies – what are they?
To be a Protected tenant you must have a non-resident landlord (in other words you aren’t a lodger) and your tenancy must have begun before the 15th of January 1989. Simple!!!! But what does it mean?
Well a Protected tenant will have a regulated or fair rent set by the old rent officer (now the VOA). AND….with Protected Tenancies there is no automatic right for the landlord to get possession like there is for Assured Shortholds and, more importantly, the landlord doesn’t get to choose the rent level, the rent officer does that and it is what is termed a Fair (i.e., non-market level) rent that the landlord cant dabble with.
I have a client at the moment in a 2 bed flat in a converted Victorian south London house where the market rent would be around £1,100 – £1,200 per month and he is paying a fixed, fair rent of £350.
Unless the tenant does something wrong, such as getting into arrears or causing a nuisance to neighbours they can stay as long as they like. A landlord can’t just sell a property from under a Protected Tenant. Effectively a landlord is stuck with a protected tenant for life at a small rent.
Yeah but I have only been a landlord for 3 years so it doesn’t affect me.
HA!!!!! Not necessarily. You can inherit them. If a person moves into property before the 15th January 1989 and hasn’t moved and you then buy a property with a sitting tenant in then you are bound by the conditions of their old style tenancy.
Or, if a protected tenant dies and their wife or husband (but not other family member) dies then their partner will also become a Protected tenant, even though it is long after 1989.
If a Protected tenant moves properties but still retains the same landlord then their Protected status will go with them.
How the hell did that happen then?
Protected tenancies (also commonly called ‘Rent Act Tenancies’ or ‘Regulated Tenancies’) were governed by the old tenant friendly Rent Act 1977. When Margaret Thatcher came to power in 1979 she was concerned about the amount of empty properties there were in the UK and the amount of homeless people there were and she came to the conclusion that the reason landlords weren’t letting was because the law was too biased in favour of the tenants so she created the Housing Act 1988, which brought us Assured and Assured Shortholds, with an automatic right of possession after a fixed term, and abolished the concept of market rents for everyone except Protected tenants. This was to incentivise landlords to start letting those empty properties and it did.
And we have been with that situation ever since. I don’t know how many Protected tenancies there are still out there, but still enough to not raise too much of an eyebrow when I come across them.
If I have one, how can I get rid of them?
A good question. Very difficult. The usual way is to negotiate a buy-out so you can start letting your property at a market rent level. How much will that cost? Well a cautionary tale. Let me take you back to around 1995. I was approached by an elderly woman renting a bedsit. The large property was bought by a GP, who asked everyone to leave. All tenants did and found new places to live, except my woman. She moved in on the 11th of January 1989….just 4 days before the new legislation, so she was a protected tenant, paying just £25 a week for her room.
He issued her with a section 21 notice, prior to going to court for possession. I warned him that it wasn’t valid because she was an old style tenant but he went ahead, and promptly lost the case.
After much too-ing and fro-ing he finally gave in and paid her £25,000 to leave so he could get vacant possession. That was 15 years ago.
Protected Tenancies are a bit of renting history, but a bit that is still alive and well. They take us back to the rent riots of 1917 and the slowly building raft of landlord-Tenant law that reflected the depression of the 1930s, the Second World War, the creation of the welfare state and Peter Rachman. The 1988 Act threw all that out of the window, but a few lucky souls are still renting a Mayfair flat for 2 toffees and a Florin.
Ben Reeve-Lewis
About Ben Reeve-Lewis: Ben has worked in housing in one form or another since 1987. He has variously been a Homelessness caseworker, Head of Homelessness for a local authority, a Tenancy Relations Officer and Housing law trainer. He now divides his time between doing contract Tenancy Relations work and as a Freelance housing law training consultant for the CIH, Shelter, Sitra and many more. Read more about Ben here.
The usual rule of thumb on an unofficial buy out is about half the difference between the value of the property with sitting rent act tenant and with vacant possession. That can be a lot. Always worth getting valuation evidence if a buy out is proposed as the difference could be very substantial.
The highest buyout I have seen/participated in was £250,000, achieved for my tenant client at a mediation on a disrepair and harassment claim, though to be fair some 45K of that was in regard to costs. So say £205,000. (That was a very good, if very long day).
Blimey NL, that was a result. Who was the landlord, Van Hoogstraaten??????
Last Blog????
Let’s just say the property was a grade II listed manor house.
I think you mean “abolished the concept of fair rents for everyone”, market rents are still highly relevant to any assured tenancy without an express rent increase clause. Plenty of RAC cases dealing with them.
Also, the cap on rent increases (a more recent change) is presumably how you get a £350 rent with a £1,100 market rent – even with a whopping scarcity reduction the fair rent must come in a big higher than £350.
250k to get vacant possession sounds like a huge amount of money to me. Tenant/s must have been young and the manor house must have been particularly valuable.
in saying that, it is not often a tenant will move out unless they are offered a considerable amount of money. Why should they? They won’t be renting anywhere else for a 100 quid a week.
Hi Ben,
I could really do with some advice about a friend of ours who is a protected tenant. His current abode apparently is squalid, at best. He clearly does have a landlord and wondered how he would go about getting into a warmer less damp property without too much hassle. He lives in Marylebone and would like to stay in the area. it comes under Westminster council, would they help maybe by sending a health officer over to assess the situation?
Yours hopefully
BD
hi somebody help me, i have purchased the property which has protected tenant. really nightmare for me as i didnt find out the property has protected tenant before auction.i am really stuck.
thanks
@BD The local authority may be able to help, or you may be able to find a firm of solicitors who would act on a no win no fee basis.
I am trying to collate a list of such firms but I only have one so far http://www.landlordlaw.co.uk/supplier-index-legal-services-tenants-claims-disrepair
(Note – any solicitors firms reading this who do this work please contact me)
@kunj k I rather think you are stuck with it unless you can sell the property on to someone else. It is REALLY important that landlords check this before buying property.
This is something I cover in my forthcoming book on section 21: http://www.yourlawstore.co.uk
In the recent discussions on the Energy Bill Chris Huhne said that F and G rated homes would have to be upgraded in order to be let after 2018. Can you see any resaon why this wouldn’t apply to protected tenancies?
@Rory No, but I am not sure what would happen if landlords failed to comply. After all the tenants will not want to lose their homes.
Maybe this is something they have not thought of, or maybe the rule will only apply to new lets.