• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

What is the landlords liability for tenants loss if they have previously complained about the locks?

This post is more than 12 years old

April 29, 2013 by Tessa Shepperson

keysHere is a question to the blog clinic from Millie who is a landlord

I have recently become a landlady for the first time and I am not sure how to handle my tenants.

When they took up their tenancy they asked for a second lock to be installed on the internal door from the garage into the kitchen because they had been advised by an alleged security expert that the lock already there was not fit for purpose.

It locked the door so I couldn’t see what the issue was, therefore I did not grant their request but gave them permission to install their own deadlock.

Six months later, the property was broken into through the garage and the internal door in question was busted. Several of the tenants’ belongings were stolen or damaged but they told me they could not claim on insurance because the lock did not meet the insurer’s standards.

I was fairly confident that I have done nothing wrong, however I am having doubts now the tenants have started talking about legal action and using words like negligent. What’s your advice, do I call their bluff and stick to my guns or have I indeed not fulfilled by obligations?

I am sure I am not the first landlord/lady who has been put in this sort of position.

You don’t say what sort of lock it is which makes it a bit difficult to answer.  For example if it was a chubb or mortice lock you are probably OK.  The fact that the tenants have had their insurance claim refused though makes it look as if the tenants were right and the lock was substandard.

I have to say Millie, that it probably would have been wise to get a better lock installed when the tenants asked you about this.

It is not a huge expense, it would have kept them happy, and you would not have your current problem.

My feeling is that you may well be vulnerable to a claim for compensation.  You would be able to defend such a claim by saying that you gave permission for them to instal their own lock – this may be sufficient but I am inclined to think that a Judge’s sympathies would be with the tenants.

One other point that occurs to me though – was the entry actually because of the poor quality lock?  You say the door was busted.  If the intruders entered by breaking down the door rather than picking the lock, then it would not have mattered if you had put in a different lock – they would have got in anyway.

Previous Post
Next Post

Filed Under: Clinic Tagged With: keys, Locks

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Reader Interactions

Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Comments

  1. Steve Turner says

    April 30, 2013 at 7:56 am

    I seems there are some missing pieces to the puzzle here.

    Have the tenants submitted proof that their insurance claim has been turned down? If not ask them for this.

    The door was inside a garage, was the garage door left open so that the internal door was easily accessed? It may be that the tenants are also at fault.

    I must say that this does seem an odd reason to reject an insurance claim if there were two doors for the perpetrators to break through, so as Tessa says: would anything have stopped them? In response to Tessa’s question about the door being busted, some standard locks are easy to push out of the frame with little force whereas heavier duty locks such as a mortise take a bit more effort.

  2. Colin Lunt says

    April 30, 2013 at 10:17 am

    As has been said there are several facts that have not been given. To make a claim the tenants would have to be based on some legal principle. In contract it does not seem as if the landlord has breached any implied term of agreement.

    In relation to the tenants’ insurance they themselves appear to have failed to ensure that the terms of insurance covered them. In negligence, also taking into account Steve’s comments they may find that they had not taken their own reasonable precautions, even though the landlord may be partly liable.

    The landlord used the word tenants in the plural; if the property is a licensable HMO then there council may have a minimum standard requirement for locks so there may be a breach there. Student HMOs are often target for burglary as a thief can get several electronic items very quickly.

    Lastly, if the tenants’ insurance was invalid for the reason of the lock, it is quite likely that the landlord’s own insurance cover is invalid for the same reason. Unfortunately, more questions than answers.

  3. Laura | Dutch Law Firm AMS says

    June 10, 2013 at 2:53 pm

    Very interesting matter, I am very curious about the outcome!

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list and get a free eBook
Sign up

Post updates

Never miss another post!
Sign up to our Post Updates or the monthly Round Up
Sign up

Worried about insurance?

Alan Boswell

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get a free eBook

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2025 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy