• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

Unlawful HMO license fees in Oxford and how to get your money back

This post is more than 12 years old

October 1, 2013 by David Smith

Oxford StudentsDavid Smith of Anthony Gold tells about one of his successful cases and how it can help you if you are an HMO landlord in Oxford

HMO licensing fees are a significant cost for many landlords. However, it now seems that some local authorities have been charging fees which are unlawful.

The power to charge a fees in respect of HMO licensing is found in s63 of the Housing Act 2004. Importantly, this power is granted in respect of licence applications only.

However, a number of local authorities charge fees for other matters associated with HMO licensing other than the direct grant of a licence. For example, Oxford City Council has sought to charge a fee for the variation of an HMO licence.

A case in the High Court recently (which actually related to the licensing of sex shops!) it has been clearly established that a council can only charge a fee for something they are explicitly authorised in a piece of legislation to charge a fee for.

On the back of this decision, as well as for other reasons, I brought a case against Oxford City Council for refusal to vary an HMO licence. As part of this case there was a dispute about whether Oxford could charge a fee for the variation.

Ultimately the Residential Property Tribunal (RPT) ruled that the fee was unlawful and that it could not be charged.

Oxford has amended its fee structure and has stated that it will not charge a fee for an HMO licence variation from 1 September 2013. However the RPT decision was made in March and, more importantly, if the variation fee is unlawful then it was always unlawful and should never have been charged. This means that it is refundable.

Anyone who has paid a fee to Oxford City Council for an HMO licence variation is entitled to recover this money. Anyone who has paid for the variation of an HMO licence with another council is also entitled to their money back. See below for suggested draft letter which you may like to use.

Dear Sirs

I write to you in regard to the fee of £<<insert fee paid>> as an HMO licence variation fee on <<insert payment date>> with respect to my property at <<insert property address>>.

I note the decision of the RPT in Crompton v Oxford City Council (CAM/38UC/HMV/2013/0006-7) in which it was held that a fee to vary an HMO licence was unlawful and beyond the power of the Council to charge.

It is accepted law that monies obtained by unlawfully agreement cannot be retained. Accordingly, I look forward to the return of the above-mentioned fee from the Council within 14 days of the date of this letter.

Yours etc

 

Previous Post
Next Post

Filed Under: Tips and How to Tagged With: David Smith, HMOs, licensing

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Reader Interactions

Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Comments

  1. Michael Bian says

    October 1, 2013 at 12:04 pm

    Thanks for this information, very helpful.

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list and get a free eBook
Sign up

Post updates

Never miss another post!
Sign up to our Post Updates or the monthly Round Up
Sign up

Worried about insurance?

Alan Boswell

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get a free eBook

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2025 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy