• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

Tenancy Agreements 33 days of tips – day 25 – Ending

This post is more than 8 years old

June 28, 2017 by Tessa Shepperson

Tenancy Agreements 33 days of tips Day 25

Clauses about ending the tenancy

You need to be very careful here and bear in mind that the statutory provisions for ending tenancies will override any private agreement you may reach with your tenants.  For example:-

Any clauses saying that the tenants must give notice (one, two months etc) if they want to leave at the end of the fixed term will be void, as tenants have the legal right to leave at the end of the fixed term without giving any notice at all.  Sorry, but its the law.  I wrote a blog post about this here.

After the fixed term has ended, if the tenant stays on, it will be on a periodic basis.  Any clause which requires the tenant to give a longer notice period than that required under the general law (28 days for weekly, 1 month for monthly, quarterly for quarterly etc, all ending at the end of a period of the tenancy) will also be void

Then there is the forfeiture clause.  This is that clause in tenancy agreements which talks about ‘re-entering’ the property if the tenant is in arrears of rent of 14, 21 days or whatever.   This is a real hangover from the past.  In the bad old days, landlords really did have the right to physically re-enter the property and turn the tenants out (and also take their stuff to pay the unpaid rent) – as commercial landlords can still do, in some circumstances.

Now ‘re-entry’ must be done by way of bringing a court claim for possession.  But forfeiture is specifically forbidden by the Housing Act 1988 – the one which sets up ASTs.  So why leave this clause in?  Well, it is actually really important.  It is necessary to have something like this to enable you to bring a claim under the ‘grounds’ in the Housing Act 1988 during the fixed term.  All forfeiture clauses nowadays refer also to the Housing Act grounds for possession.

It also possible that your AST may one day revert to a common law tenancy – for example, if the tenant sublets it, or perhaps if it is assigned to a limited company.  In which case you *can* bring possession proceedings based on forfeiture.

The Office of Fair Trading made it clear, however (in their guidance on unfair terms) that the clause must not be misleading, and must make it clear that the tenant can only be evicted after the landlord has obtained a court order for possession.  And also that the tenant retains his rights under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977.

Break clauses are the other ‘ending’ clause that we need to mention here.  Not all tenancies have one.  It is basically a clause which says that if a certain procedure is followed (generally two months notice in writing), the tenant or the landlord is allowed to end (or ‘break’) the tenancy early.

It is important that, if you have a break clause, it can be used by both the landlord and the tenant.  Some agreements have two clauses, one for each.  That is OK, so long as the one the tenant uses is not more onerous.  They should be the same.

You should also make it very clear what people have to do to break the tenancy.   I have seen some that were so convoluted that it was practically impossible to comply with them.

Note that landlords will also need to serve a section 21 notice (whether this is mentioned in the tenancy agreement or not).  Following the procedure in the break clause ends the tenancy.  The s21 notice will entitle you to bring proceedings for possession if the tenant does not leave.  Both are necessary.

Bear in mind also that the break clause will just end the fixed term – the tenancy will then continue as a periodic tenancy in the usual way.  So if your tenant stays on in the property he is not doing anything illegal.  He still has a tenancy.

Summing it up in your tenancy agreement

I think it is a good idea to summarise somewhere how the tenancy can be ended.  In my tenancy agreements, I generally do this at the start of the tenancy, before the main terms and conditions begin.  Then everyone knows where they stand.

Just for the record, they are:

  • Tenant moving out at the end of the fixed term
  • Tenant moving out as a result of the landlord’s notice (normally s21)
  • Tenant moving out after giving his own notice to quit (only possible after the fixed term has ended)
  • Landlord and tenant agreeing that the tenant may ‘surrender’ the tenancy early
  • The parties signing a new tenancy agreement (which automatically ends the preceding one), and
  • A court order for possession

One of joint tenants wanting to leave

This can be a problem with joint tenants, and it you think it is likely it may be best to give tenants individual agreements for their own room (as discussed on Day 5).  Basically, there are three ways you can deal with it:

  • Agree to allow a new tenancy agreement for the remainder of the term with a replacement tenant (approved by you) and the remaining tenants – assuming of course that the remaining tenants will agree to sign it.  This is the most complex solution as you will also have to deal with deposit issues.
  • Refuse to allow a new tenancy agreement but say that the tenants can take in a lodger to cover the outgoing tenant’s share of the rent (with the outgoing tenant still remaining liable under the tenancy agreement)
  • Refuse to agree to anything and say you will hold all the tenants liable whether they are living there or not.

It depends on the circumstances of the situation which you agree, but perhaps option 2 is the simplest.  If the lodger proves reliable, he can then sign up as a tenant if the tenancy is renewed at the end of the fixed term.

I discuss this all in more detail in my Changing Tenants kit plus there is a lot of information about lodgers on my (free) Lodger Landlord web-site.

Landlord Law Tenancy AgreementsNB Find out more about my Tenancy Agreement Service on Landlord Law

click-here

 

Previous Post
Next Post

Filed Under: Tips and How to Tagged With: Tenancy Agreement 33 days

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Reader Interactions

Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Comments

  1. Lawcruncher says

    June 29, 2017 at 10:19 am

    “Tenant moving out as a result of the landlord’s notice (normally s21)”

    Another much disputed point! In practice landlords give notices and tenants move out and that is an end to it. However, it has been confirmed that the service of a S 21 notice does not remove the need for a tenant given a S 21 notice to give a notice to quit. In Laine and Mitchell v Cadwallader & Cadwallader (2001) 33 HLR 397 the Court of Appeal said:

    “[…] the judge […] seems to have overlooked the tenant’s obligation to serve notice to quit if he wishes unilaterally to determine a periodic tenancy, an obligation which is not ousted by any statutory provision in the Housing Act 1988 [. …]”

  2. Paul says

    July 3, 2017 at 10:43 am

    I wish the CMA would clear up what’s happening with the OFT guidance on tenancy agreements and produce a new one…it appears to have been ‘withdrawn’ but nothing put in it’s place. I understand it’s still relevant but some parts of it must be irrelevant/incorrect, or it wouldn’t have been withdrawn?

  3. Preetha Luther says

    August 16, 2017 at 1:27 pm

    If the section 21 is served just days before the end of the fixed term, does the tenant need to stay for the period of the two months or can they give one months notice and leave ahead ( Tenancy agreement states that after the end of the fixed term its periodic tenancy but two months notice though the rental is monthly?

  4. Tessa Shepperson says

    August 16, 2017 at 1:56 pm

    A tenant can always leave before the end of the tenancy fixed term without penalty and the fact that the landlord may have served a section 21 notice will not change that.

    If the tenant stays on then a periodic tenancy will be created and the tenant will normally have to give notice to quit to end this. However, I think there is a clause in the Deregulation Act which provides that tenants do not have to pay for rent which falls due after they have vacated the property.

    If there is a clause in the tenancy agreement saying that the tenants notice period is two months for a monthly periodic tenancy – that clause will be void under the Unfair Terms rules.

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list and get a free eBook
Sign up

Post updates

Never miss another post!
Sign up to our Post Updates or the monthly Round Up
Sign up

Worried about insurance?

Alan Boswell

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get a free eBook

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2025 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy