• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

Tessa Shepperson Newsround #21

This post is more than 8 years old

August 18, 2017 by Tessa Shepperson

Tessa SheppersonHello and welcome back to my fortnightly ramble through some of our housing related news items.

Immigration in Cambridge

There are many reasons for our housing crisis but it seems that in Cambridge they blame immigration.

This is shown by a new survey which also shows that Cambridge is more positive about the immigration saying it improves cultural diversity whereas in nearby March there is more concern about the negative impact of low skilled EU workers.

Jill Rutter, Director of Strategy at British Future, said:

The conversations in Cambridge and March show how attitudes to immigration, even in the same county, can vary from place to place depending on the types of migration that people experience. Yet both groups were worried that more needed to be done to address the impact of high migration on housing in their towns.

If you want to have your say on immigration you can take part in the online National Conversation.

How the Grenfell Survivors could be housed

I was a bit startled to read this story on the LBC website which states that an estate in Chelsea has been deliberately left empty.

The owners want to re-develop the estate with less social housing and more private housing sold to make a profit.  The plan was refused but in the meantime, the estate has been emptied and deliberately left empty and vandalised.

The article points out that there is more than enough vacant accommodation here to house all the Grenfell survivors.  In a video on the LBC site a former resident claims that they could be ‘refreshed’ and made ready for Grenfell residents within a month.

Public Enquiry

Talking of Grenfell, the terms of reference have now been announced for the Public Inquiry and can be read here.

It will be very interesting to see the conclusions reached on the matters listed, which includes at (c)

the scope and adequacy of building regulations, fire regulations, and other legislation, guidance, and industry practice relating to the design, construction, equipping and management of high-rise residential buildings;

However, Joe Beswick and Katya Nasim, campaigners with the Radical Housing Network writing in the Guardian have called for an independent parallel inquiry to mount a broad investigation into housing policy and practice:

The decision to limit the scope of the inquiry to technical issues will produce an outcome that frames Grenfell as an isolated case, an outlier. It is only by examining the impact of decades of privatisation, deregulation and cuts to social housing, and the associated reinvention of local government as government by private company, that we can truly answer the question of how this tragedy could be allowed to happen in 21st century Britain.

I agree that we need a national conversation about social housing policy – something Ben and I have been banging on about on this blog for years.

However, I think there is also a place for Sir Martin Moore-Bick’s more limited inquiry under its current terms of reference.  Its findings will no doubt provide ammunition which can be used to inform the wider arguments.

More housing problems

Even without an Inquiry, it is clear that there are big problems with our housing throughout the country:

  • residents are being ordered out of their homes in four 13 story tower blocks in Ledbury due to gas safety fears
  • whereas 10% of housing in Kensington and Chelsea is empty most of the time, while
  • Another survey claims that 1/3 of private rented housing fails basic health and safety standards

It’s not good, is it?

But good for Motorhome vendors

It seems that there has been a recent surge in motorhome and caravan purchases according to this article in the Telegraph.

Not just for ‘staycation’ holidays but also so people visiting friends with no spare room can have somewhere to stay. Spare rooms it seems are becoming an endangered species.

If you do this though, you need to be careful where you park to avoid breaking the law.  The article states:

If you park on a drive that’s fine, as long as there is no covenant in place which forbids it.

If you are parked on the road this is fine as long as you are in a campervan, as most of them are no bigger than a large car. Caravans are not allowed.

Generally, it is better to stay in a caravan park or in a pub car park which allows caravans and camper vans. This is because you can easily connect to gas and dispose of waste.

So now you know.

1925 Law of Property Act outed

One bizarre news story which is a warning to kind hearted neighbours everywhere is this story in the Mail.

This is about the Hardings, a couple who have been told by a Judge that, due to a ‘little known’ act from 1925, they cannot evict their tenant and one time friend, Mr Gregory, from the property they purchased to ‘help him’ 20 years ago, when he was struggling to pay his mortgage.  After the purchase, the Hardings rented it back to Gregory at a concessionary rate of £800 pcm

The act in question is the Law of Property Act 1925 – which although ‘little known’ to Mail readers is very well known to lawyers as it underpins our current land law system.

The case mentioned in the article, Bannister v Bannister, is about someone acquiring a life interest where property has been purchased from them on the cheap on the understanding that they could live there free for the rest of their life.  Life interests under the LPA25 equate to a 90-year lease.

The Judge found that the Hardings purchase was very similar so now they are stuck with a 90-year lease and a tenant whose rent is limited to £800 pm.  And they have to pay his costs of £11,000.

Two things I would like to know:

  1. Did the Hardings get Gregory’s property at an undervalue?  The article does not say but I assume that is one reason for the Judge’s decision
  2. Did the Hardings get any legal advice at the time about what they were doing?  Although if they did I suppose its a bit late now to make a claim.

Generally, it’s best not to be too kind to people where property is concerned.

What made me smile this week

The (allegedly) real quotes from letters to the Council on housing issues I just found here.

Previous Post
Next Post

Filed Under: News and comment

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.
Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list and get a free eBook
Sign up

Post updates

Never miss another post!
Sign up to our Post Updates or the monthly Round Up
Sign up

Worried about insurance?

Alan Boswell

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get a free eBook

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2025 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy