• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Act 2025
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

Landlord Law Newsround #242

This post is more than 3 years old

May 6, 2022 by Tessa Shepperson

Our regular weekly roundup of news items that interested us. This week we focus on the Government’s plan to revitalise the right to buy scheme as well as analysis on the state of the sector through Propertymark’s latest report.

Boris Johnson considers reviving Right to Buy

This week, prime minister Boris Johnson is considering reviving the right to buy policy, allowing long term tenants the ability to buy their house from a housing association at a discounted price. The idea is designed to help ‘generation rent’ as more houses will be available to buy and will allow more people to own their home. This will lead to around 2.5 million households being available to buy at a discount of up to 70%.

In addition to this, the Government is also considering axing the current policy that developers must build a set number of affordable homes in favour of making them pay into an infrastructure fund that councils can then use to fund their own projects. This, the Government hopes, will increase housing stock in areas.

However, both of these ideas have been questioned by many prominent members of the industry. Polly Neate, the chief executive of Shelter, said:

 There could not be a worse time to sell off what remains of our last truly affordable social homes. The living cost crisis means more people are on the brink of homelessness than homeownership…

Shelter predicts that nearly a million people are on the ‘housing association waiting list’ across the UK looking for either supported or social accommodation. In addition to this, from the previous right to buy policy, only 5% of the housing stock was ever replaced.

Landlord Law, and indeed many people within the industry, see the right to buy policy as a bad idea (indeed, we wrote a post about the shortcomings of the policy in 2017, which you can find here). It is short-sighted: reducing your social housing supply whilst also not replacing it all for the sake of homeownership will only lead to disaster. Many of the housing problems today ( for example, high demand in certain areas) can be traced back to or at least were exacerbated by the right to buy policy that was introduced in the 1980s.

The idea to axe developers obligations to build affordable housing in their developments is also questionable. Currently, legal loopholes enable developers to get out of the obligation to build affordable housing (an article on this can be found here). This policy, whilst admittedly will close this loophole, will raise other issues, for example:

  • In high demand areas, how do councils propose to integrate social housing if the more appealing areas are bought by developers? Will this lead to private housing and social housing being built in two separate areas, or will they be integrated together?
  • Will all the funding go towards social or supported housing, or will it be up to the council’s discretion?
  • How much funding will the council get per development? The Government must ensure it is a significant amount.

The Government may find it best to look for policies that were not already deemed a failure in the 1980s…

Propertymark warning

This week, Propertymark’s market snapshot report has indicated that the prediction of a hostile market for renters has come true with rents rising and stocks diminishing.

The report showed that there is now an expanding gap between supply and demand of properties, with tenants remaining in the same property longer than before. The fact tenants are staying in the same properties has exacerbated the supply situation also, with more tenants being reluctant to move in today’s economic climate.

The report showed that, on average, the number of landlords that withdrew their properties to sell was three per agency branch. This rose from February, when the average was two. In addition, Some 71 per cent of member agents reported rent prices increasing, which is a slight decrease from 74 per cent in February but is still significantly higher than the same time last year, which stood at 60 per cent.

Propertymark chief executive Nathan Emerson said:

When an increase in tenants staying put for longer occurs, the churn of properties that would normally come back into the market begins to stagnate, feeding the issue further…. Many landlords feel their rights are being eroded, meaning they are more likely to sell.

National Association of Property Buyers on scrapping section 21

The National Association of Property Buyers (NAPB) has this week said that scores of landlords are leaving the industry, which has given rise to soaring rents. This, NAPB has described, is a symptom of the Government’s over-regulation and a clampdown on landlords’ rights, most significantly, the end of section 21.

NAPB, while understanding the need for a change of the current eviction powers, is worried that the timing of this may cause further landlords to leave the industry.

Spokesperson Jonathan Rolande says:

It’s very important tenants renting a property have protection in place, but by imposing sweeping new powers at this juncture the government also runs the risk of driving out large swathes of landlords in one go.

Generation Rent director on insulation and household warmth

This week, Generation rent director Baroness Alicia Kennedy has claimed that a quarter of a million  landlords are letting families live in homes ‘that are so expensive to heat they are illegal to let out,’

South West England is where she claims private renters are most likely to live in a home that fails Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards – nine percent of households, compared with six percent in England as a whole.

The Baroness also attacked local authorities, who she said do not do enough with the enforcement powers given to them to tackle landlords not complying with the minimum energy efficiency standards (MEES).

Baroness Kennedy, on the issue said:

A quarter of a million households are in homes too cold to be legal and with energy bills through the roof, they are paying hundreds, if not thousands, of pounds more than they should as a result…. Councils have the data and the powers they need to protect the most vulnerable tenants – but at the moment most are not using them

Snippets:

  • Platform launches solution to satisfy banks over undesignated client accounts
  • UPDATE: Wood-burning stove emissions rule changes
  • LATEST: Appeal granted for landmark clarification on who pays rent repayment orders
  • New platform will help landlords optimise yields from property
  • NEW: Government ‘landlord bashing’ is fuelling rental supply crisis, warns NRLA
  • Government backs landlord licensing despite objectives being achieved

Newsround will be back next week

Previous Post
Next Post

Filed Under: News and comment

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.
Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list and get a free eBook
Sign up

Post updates

Never miss another post!
Sign up to our Post Updates or the monthly Round Up
Sign up

Worried about insurance?

Insurance Course

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get a free eBook

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2026 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy