• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Act 2025
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

Are these tenants correct in saying they do not have a protected shorthold tenancy?

This post is more than 2 years old

October 26, 2023 by Tessa Shepperson

This is a question to the blog clinic fast track from Martha (not her real name), who is a landlord in England.

I let a house in December 1981 on a Protected Shorthold Tenancy. The tenants are still there & have committed no breach, but I wish to take back possession.

In February 2016, at my request, they signed a new Assured Shorthold Tenancy. They have been told that they now have a protected tenancy and the right to remain. Am I able to repossess, and if so, how do I go about it, please?

Answer

Protected shorthold tenancies were the precursor to the Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) that we are all familiar with.

They were brought in by the Thatcher government in the Housing Act 1980 and were succeeded by ASTs in the Housing Act 1988.  So, no new protected tenancies could be created after 15 January 1989.

There were a number of conditions for the creation of a Protected Shorthold Tenancy:

  • The term must have been not less than one year and not more than five years
  • There was no break clause allowing the landlord to end the tenancy before the end of the first fixed term
  • The landlord must have given the tenant a ‘Notice of Protected Shorthold Tenancy’ in the prescribed form, before the tenancy started
  • Some tenancies had to have a registered fair rent.  Those within Greater London and granted between 28 November 1980 and 3 May 1987 and outside Greater London granted between 28 November 1980 and 3 May 1987.  It looks as if this would have applied to your tenancy.

You will need to have complied with all of these.

Changes on issuing a new tenancy

I have (hopefully) good news for you.  As your tenants have signed a new tenancy agreement,  34(3) of the Housing Act 1988 provides that their tenancy will have converted to an AST.  Assuming that is that you did not give a notice saying this would not happen (which I assume you did not do).

So, provided you had correctly created the Protected Shorthold tenancy in 1981, it should now be an AST.  Allowing you to evict using the ‘no fault’ section 21 procedure.

But did you have a protected shorthold?

Your tenant’s adviser has probably advised them that you did not properly create the Protected Tenancy in 1981.  Which would mean that the tenancy has always been a Protected Tenancy under the Rent Act 1977 (and if so, this is something which cannot be changed later).

It looks as if these tenants will defend if you issue proceedings under section 21.  So you need to be in a position to prove, to the satisfaction of the Judge on the balance of probabilities, that you complied with all those conditions back in 1981.  Meaning that a protected shorthold tenancy WAS created.

So for this, you will need to have;

  • A copy of the original tenancy agreement, signed by the tenants and
  • A copy of the Notice of Protected Tenancy served back in 1981 and proof that it was served on the tenants before the tenancy started and
  • Proof that the tenancy had a fair rent registered at that relevant time

Note that under s55 of the Housing Act 1980, the Judge does have the power to waive the requirement for service of the notice, if he considers it ‘just and equitable’ to do so.

However, this would mean a contested case.  This would take a long time and could be expensive.  If they are financially eligible, your tenants may be entitled to Legal Aid.  If you lost the case, you would be ordered to pay your tenants’ legal costs – which could be expensive, particularly if they get legal aid.

Conclusion

I suspect that the tenants have been advised that you did not set up the protected shorthold tenancy properly in 1981 and that they, therefore, have (and have always had) a Rent Act protected tenancy.

You need to check your paperwork and see whether you would be able to counter this.

I would strongly advise that if you decide to proceed, you use solicitors and get them to advise thoroughly on your case first.

It is essential that you use solicitors who are familiar with this work.  Such solicitors are quite hard to find as Protected Shortholds ended in 1989 – before many solicitors today were even born!

However, any of the solicitors on our Landlord Law Telephone Advice panel should be able to help.

Previous Post
Next Post

Filed Under: Clinic Tagged With: Protected tenancy

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.
Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list and get a free eBook
Sign up

Post updates

Never miss another post!
Sign up to our Post Updates or the monthly Round Up
Sign up

Worried about insurance?

Insurance Course

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get a free eBook

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2026 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy