• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Act 2025
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

Ben Reeve Lewis Friday Newsround #62

This post is more than 13 years old

June 15, 2012 by Ben Reeve-Lewis

[Ben ReeveBen on a chair Lewis has a head full of stuff, but still brings in the news stories  …]

Not been sleeping very well this past week, my head’s been too full of ideas.

I’m in the middle of writing 2 books on landlord tenant stuff for publications at the end of summer, been training housing officers in Cardiff, 2 days in court with mortgage repossession cases and pondering why one of our office managers has suddenly taken to walking around with his hands permanently in his pockets.

pocketsIt used to be just one hand and now it’s both. Various theories are doing the rounds about what they are doing in there but all have resolved not to shake his hand until he stops doing it.

In fact new and interesting ideas have caught my eye in my news surfing too.

The bigger picture

Most notably a story in ‘New Start’,  an online magazine for CLES, the Centre For Local Economic Strategies, of which I am big fan. Although admittedly a housing geek I also realise that housing is only part of the picture of how we live.

Our environment and the way that we interact with it is just as important. A point I raised in last week’s newsround on Deptford. The phrase “Its only bricks and mortar” must be one of the most misguided aphorism’s in the English language.

The article reports on a trend called ‘Pop-up urbanism’, whereby projects are set up that take charge of empty spaces or buildings temporarily and create unique initiatives to enhance the lives of the people who live there.

The aim of pop-up urbanism is to attract creative types to a city. Many councils are building them into their regeneration projects but the author of the article Oli Mould argues that they are becoming more narrowly defined and homogenised as a result, with projects concentrating on night time shopping or cafes.

Community initiatives

Instead Oli points us to more interesting initiatives that emanate from the community itself rather than creative consultants being brought in.

For instance the Orestad development in Copenhagen, a half finished building project waiting for more investment to get it finished, has been turned into a ‘Plug and Play’ site, a temporary playground, where gym equipment has been deposited, basketball courts and in line skate tracks have been fashioned in the full knowledge that they aren’t permanent.

Artist Luke Jeram placed pianos in city centres inviting people to just sit and play. Oli argues they could even be more permanent and states:-

“there should no top-down governance attempts to curate these interventions; this flies in the face of their raison d’être. But there is a middle ground that can be occupied.

By allowing planners and architects the opportunity to create rough edges, design spaces that don’t have any specific commercial operation and to facilitate places that encourage engagement; cities will become places less about security concerns and consumerism, and more about citizenship, creativity and play”.

These are recurring themes for CLES. A website worth watching for it’s intelligent and thoughtful views on how we live.

Doing it for ourselves

And while Oli Mould urges governance to back off and let communities do it, the head of the Chartered Institute of Housing, Robin Lawler, opening this week’s CIH conference in Manchester pointed to the lack of governance in housing that means housing organisations are going to have to step up to the mark and devise their own solutions.

He said:-

“this needs to be a decade of sector-led solutions where housing professionals must look critically at themselves and their performance”

His words, recorded on the Housing Excellence website are very in tune with what is going on, so much more so than any misplaced, daft utterances of Shapps, who just doesn’t seem to get it.

Robin went on to say:-

“there is now an overwhelming sense that we have reached a tipping point for housing and that the scale of the crisis is now recognised across the UK.

With governments, the media and the public now accepting that we are facing a housing crisis that needs urgent action if we are to deliver a functional housing system now and in the future.”

It is time to nudge the bumbling Mr Shapps aside and say “Oh get out of the way and let me do it”. To be fair to the government they have gifted us localism which allows us to do that very thing, so I’m not going to complain too much.

Dealing with hoarders

I read a curious story in the Guardian about the problem of dealing with people who cant stop hoarding things.

Over the past few years there have been many documentaries on the subject, presenting people as curious, harmless eccentrics but as the article points out, hoarding isn’t isolated behaviour, it’s a symptom of other problems such as depression, past traumas, OCD, etc, and these problems have other spin off effects on life and communities.

The Orbit housing group have formed a care and repair team to tackle the problem. Now what I love about this kind of thinking is that to the untrained eye this can seem like a mad waste of money, typical leftie, bleeding heart stuff, as many call it, but there is actually a real practical reason why these kinds of projects are worthwhile.

Hoarding often brings with it disrepair problems that can be dangerous to the tenants and costly to the council and money spent helping people who hoard is usually cheaper than dealing with the fallout in way that doesn’t see the whole picture.

Holding on to the cash

A point not lost on Eric Pickles this week with his announcement that he will give money to councils who adopt their Troubled Families initiative.  The aim is to cut the real cost of coping with numerous multi agency involvement to tackle those families who are a big headache in an area. He said:-

“We cannot go on spending so much taxpayers’ money on such a small amount of families without turning their lives around once and for all”.

He elaborated further:-

“Everyone will benefit from getting kids off the streets and into school; getting parents off benefits and into work; and cutting youth crime and anti-social behaviour. But it is also right that we will only pay councils in full if they deliver the results that we require.”

For years councils had a variety of teams and units, specialist little groups who often did this work already but the rapaciousness of government cuts to budgets meant these teams who used to work with these families got ditched. Now we have to deal with them anew just to get back the money that they took off us in the first place.

Maybe our office manager is actually holding on to bundles of cash given by Pickles. That’s why his hands are really in his pockets lately.

Ben Reeve Lewis

Follow Ben on twitterBen’s runs Home Saving Expert, where he shares his secrets on defending people’s homes from mortgage repossession Visit his blog and get some help and advice on mortgage difficulties, catch up with him on Twitter and check out his free report “An Encouraging note on Dealing with your Mortgage Lender” and have it sent right to your inbox.

Picture : Deptford HIgh Street

Previous Post
Next Post

Filed Under: News and comment

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Reader Interactions

Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Comments

  1. JS says

    June 15, 2012 at 10:56 am

    One of my personal favourite Council intervention teams was in Hounslow in Middlesex and it was called the “Feltham Anti Social Behaviour Action Group,” or, for short, FASBAG.

    I’m sure that’s considered strong language in some quarters.

    Get lost, you FASBAG.

    In High Wycombe, one of the towns that I grew up in, they recently bunged in a skate ramp underneath the railway arches. Completely free. No beady-eyed watchmen to make sure that people don’t just themselves. Just a big chunk of concrete and fences and let them get on with it. Every time I’ve been back there since leaving there’s more often than not someone on it on a bike, or a skateboard, or whatever, with no opening or closing times. It’s just there because it’s there.

    (Incidentally, did you know that skateboarding evolved initially in the 1970s as a way for surfers to keep their hands in on the off season? A skate ramp is basically a big concrete wave, if you think about it.)

  2. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    June 15, 2012 at 12:12 pm

    I love the innate tendency of humans to take things over, like guerilla gardening where people plant veg on roundabouts or those women who knit covers for post boxes.

    Young people are particularly good at it – think Parkour where those guys find creative ways to jump over things in their environment.

    I spent 5 years as a kid living on the edge of Bishop Auckland in County Durham, where my Mum’s side of the family are from and every group of kids used to build camps to a variety of standards. My mates once had a great one in an empty concrete space under a railway line which we furnished with discarded car seats. We used to bunk off school, pool our dinner money to buy biscuits and comics and sit there for the day reading and chatting. If we had the internet then we could have formed online groups and blogs and started competitions for the most creative camps.

    This is why I love the internet, the ability to link people up.

    A few years ago Southwark council decided to de-cant the Heygate Estate at the Elephant and Castle and demolish it. Before they did they let an artist take over a council flat and spray it throughout with that studd that makes crystals grow in a jar, turning the whole flat into a turquoise crystal grotto. How cool is that?

    Some great photos of it here http://www.flickr.com/photos/cowbite/3781644743/in/photostream/

  3. JamieT says

    June 15, 2012 at 1:34 pm

    I agreee with what you’re saying about hoarders. We’ve had a two or three elderly hoarders as tenants over the years. They all caused significant damage to the property and supporting them and dealing with the fallout aftwerwards cost the councils a great deal of time and money.

    I’m not sure I’m in agreement with the last section though. Yes, for years councils did have a variety or teams, units and specialist groups but they did very little to improve the overall trend in anti-social behaviour because – like most public bodies – departments are too disjointed, they lack central policy, strategy and control, and there is almost a complete lack of interdepartmental communication and co-operation. I’m speaking from experience.

  4. JamieT says

    June 15, 2012 at 1:36 pm

    P.s. When I say tenants who were ‘elderly hoarders’ I’m referring to older tenants who hoard, not tenants hoarding old people :)

  5. Rentergirl says

    June 15, 2012 at 2:17 pm

    What no mention of Grant Shapps and his enldessly amusing genius? I can’t let this happen. There: Grant Shapps. Tis done. He is duly mentioned.

  6. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    June 15, 2012 at 2:42 pm

    Elderly hoarders hahaha

    Yeah Penny, maybe I ought to have a bit more consistency, a Shapps Corner maybe.

    Yes Jamie I know what you mean about those teams maybe not being as results-focussed as they could have been, plus the often bizarre political and PC arguments that used to erupt between them at times, worthy of Monty Python’s Life of Brian on occassion.

    The trouble is, already overstretched staff in unrelated teams now have to provide results to get back the money we used to have anyway. I’m not sure this is the best way to go about it. “Get the result and we’ll pay you”. I think they should provide the money, ring fence it and make it dependant on a set of results criteria that we could work to in order to gain similar funding next year to keep it going.

  7. JS says

    June 16, 2012 at 12:15 am

    Yep, intradepartmental politicking. I have family members who work for Councils and it seems that each department’s trying to stitch up each other department.

    We have something in our borough called the Single Homeless Project and the support workers for same send us plenty homelessness clients. But they can’t provide very useful supporting evidence because they can’t be seen to be challenging the Council’s decisions. Or so one of them said to me.

    I would write more, but my new PC arrived today and the video card on it is busted. Which is deeply annoying. So I’m in a fairly foul mood.

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list and get a free eBook
Sign up

Post updates

Never miss another post!
Sign up to our Post Updates or the monthly Round Up
Sign up

Worried about insurance?

Insurance Course

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get a free eBook

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2026 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy