• Home
  • About
  • Clinic
  • Freebies
  • Training
    • Workshops and Online Training
    • Landlord Law Conference
  • Eco Landlords
  • Landlord Law

The Landlord Law Blog

From landlord and tenant lawyer Tessa Shepperson

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News & comment
  • Cases
  • Tenants
    • Penalties for breaching tenancy rules
    • 15 Places for tenant help
  • Clinic
  • Podcasts
    • Interview
    • Surgery
  • Series
    • Analysis
    • should law and justice be free
    • HMO Basics
    • Tenancy Agreements 33 days
    • Airbnb
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • The Deregulation Act Explained
    • Tips

Running a business from rented property

November 9, 2010 by Tessa J Shepperson

Home business?Should you object to your tenant running a business?

I was a bit surprised by an announcement recently from Housing Minister Grant Shapps recently on the Communities and Local Government website.  This urges social landlords to consider allowing social tenants to run businesses from their homes.

I have always taken the view that, certainly with reference to private rented property, it is not a good idea to agree to this.

If the use of a property changes to being primarily commercial use, my understanding is that it may then come under the business premises legislation rather than the Housing Act 1988. This could affect the right of the landlord to recover possession.  Not something that most landlords would want, I am sure.

The point being that if you have agreed to the property being used for business use, you may not be able to prevent that use escalating to the level where the Housing Act will no longer apply.

Or can you?

Would it be possible to draft a clause which limits the commercial use to a specified level and provides that the property must always be used primarily for residential use?  How effective would this be if the tenant disregarded it and escalated his commercial use, perhaps even moving out?  Would the landlord be able to prevent the property coming under the business premises legislation?

What do other lawyers think?

Photo by nikchame

Print Friendly

Filed Under: News and comment Tagged With: home businesses

IMPORTANT: Please check the date of the post above - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Notes on comments:

For personal landlord and tenant related problems, please use our >> Blog Clinic.
Note that we do not publish all comments, please >> click here to read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months.

Keep up with the news on Landlord Law blog!

To get posts sent direct to your email in box click here

About Tessa J Shepperson

Tessa is a specialist landlord & tenant lawyer and the creator of this site! She is a director of Landlord Law Services which runs Landlord Law and Easy Law Training.

« Tenants legal help: five tips on your tenancy agreement
Shapps aims to stop squatters »

Comments

  1. David says

    November 9, 2010 at 9:14 AM

    Wasn’t there a case some years ago where a B&B was let as a house on an AST with a preclusion from business use. The tenant did run it as a B&B and in considering this the court concluded the agreed use was what mattered. Would this not be a consideration? This is much more common these days because you cannot say to tenants “you cannot answer your work mobile from home” or “you cannot log onto your work emails (web mail or blackberry)”. Therefore, at what point does the tenant do work from home?

    What about a recent case I saw where the tenant ran their internet sales business from home? All goods were dispatched from a remote locations and all sales took place on line. I think some new legislation to tidy this up, not only for the social sector, would be of great help.

  2. Michael Johnson says

    November 9, 2010 at 6:16 PM

    The danger is that the courts will see such a tenancy as a mixed use commercial and residential tenancy, such as a tenant running a pub or fast food takeaway and living on the premises with his or her family. This lease could nomally have the worst of both worlds for an unwary landlord, as it could have the business lease protection of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 but also be covered by the Protection from Eviction Act.

    The safest way around the problem would seem to be a “contracted out” business lease, which does not have 1954 Act protection and so eviction can take place after the end of the lease period. However, I would advise any landlord to take expert advice before attempting to enter into such a lease, due to (for example) the strict statutory “health warning” requirements.

  3. Tessa Shepperson says

    November 9, 2010 at 6:58 PM

    Thank you Michael, that is exactly the sort of thing I was thinking of (although I am not a commercial property lawyer, and therefore hesitate to give any advice in this area).

    What is your view about the government’s advice to social landlords to permit business use?

    David, I agree that in this mobile and internet connected life we have nowadays, there may be problems as you suggest. What does anyone else think?

  4. Michael Johnson says

    November 10, 2010 at 1:22 PM

    Quite apart from the costs involved in drawing up a new (and carefully drafted) lease, the landlord will need to check that the freehold title doesn’t contain any covenants against business use. Even if any legal advice is at the expense of the tenant, there are plenty of traps for the unwary.

    The Government advice doesn’t give much assistance with these sort of practical problems for landlords.

“Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice - in England & Wales UK”

Subscribe to the Landlord Law Blog by email

Never miss another post!

Choose whether you want to get
>> daily updates or just the
>> weekly roundups

You will also get a FREE Ebook!

Get Your Free Ebook:

Click to get your Free Ebook

>> Click Here for Your Free Copy

Featured Post

The end of Section 21 – a quick look at its history

The end of Section 21 – a quick look at its history

If you are new to the blog >> click here

Worried about Insurance?

Landlord Law Insurance Mini-Course

Some of our Other Services:

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Although Tessa, or guest bloggers, may from time to time, give helpful comments to readers' questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service - so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Associated sites

Landlord Law Services
Tenant Law
Eco Landlords
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2019 Tessa Shepperson.

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

© 2006–2019 Tessa Shepperson | Rainmaker Platform | Contact Page | Log in