• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Act 2025
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

Ben Reeve Lewis Newsround #24

This post is more than 14 years old

September 9, 2011 by Ben Reeve-Lewis

Ben on a chair[Ben Reeve Lewis is thinking about planning this week and getting excited about new ideas …]

I pick subjects for this newsround quite serendipitously. Sometimes it is prompted by a fan-fared government announcement of the latest new idea, sometimes I just notice a general theme developing in the news based on chit chat floating round between the internet’s housing community, sometimes it is triggered by something that happened in my day job.

This week I am intrigued by arguments about planning permission, a subject of which I admit I know absolutely ‘Jack’.

Why planning?

The inspirational trigger is me cooking meatballs in red wine and tomato sauce whilst listening to an argument on Radio 4’s ‘PM’ programme about planning permission v. Nimbyism.

I am hoping that in researching this piece I will educate myself. As usual I have no idea where this post will end up.

Perhaps the reason I sat up and took notice is that the Nimby position was being presented by the brilliant Colonel Bob Stewart, Tory MP for leafy Beckenham, on the south east London edge of Kent, a man for whom I have a lot of time for, or ‘Max Respek’ as the ‘Yoof’ say, with a forward thrusting inclination of the forefinger and thumb.

Politics and the past

Why? I certainly wouldn’t call myself a Tory but I wouldn’t call myself a Socialist anymore either. Lib Dem?……..Possibly but only in the robust form espoused by John Stuart Mill, Octavia Hill etc, not Clegg’s bunch of pathetic 6th form prefects, with their ‘Lets not upset anyone’ policies.

It seems that most of us 80s Lefties from the Hatton/Scargill years find ourselves getting more right wing as we get older. It is as inevitable as hair in the ears and a love of Pink Floyd, although for my part, being a different generation, I can confess that I still have an inexplicable fondness for mashed-up Break-beat, Hard-House and techno.

While I was making a tit of myself in the clubs of the early 1990s, wearing white gloves and brandishing glow sticks, Colonel Bob was honing his moves, negotiating between warring factions in Bosnia. He took his learnt skills a few years later and did a series of excellent TV documentaries called “At war with next door”, teaching negotiation techniques for neighbour disputes.

So I was surprised to hear Bob take this line but I’ll come back to him.

Build our way out or Nimby it to death?

Grant ShappsShapps has taken the odd break from opening fetes  to actually address the housing crisis by slackening planning laws. Not new news I know but it is the one area where you can see him espousing reasonably sensible thoughts in his role as housing minister, which I am sure he sees as only an irritating but necessary toilet break on the road to becoming Home Secretary.

The spanner in the works comes from different directions. Despite trumpeting easier planning laws, planning approvals have actually dropped 25% recently.

Village greens and bowling greens

The registering of village greens, which I have written about before, as a route to blocking planning permission has soared since it was introduced, and last week Bowling Greens were given the same legal position, with what any idiot would predict would be the same result.

Why oh why would you announce the relaxing of planning regulations to get us out of this crisis whilst at the same time introducing new methods to block it?

Building for growth?

house buildingInside Housing ran a story this week  about how increasing house building projects to 300,000 would boost the economy by a massive £75 billion pounds and in the process reduce rents, because demand would fall and bring rents with them. Also in the process they would boost employment in the denuded building trade.

I seem to recall, in my dim memory that the proposed cuts to housing benefit aimed to save between £17 & £19 billion. If the Centre for Economic and Business research (hardly a loony left think tank) are to be believed, surely expansion is better than contraction? Which points us straight back to John Maynard-Keynes’s arguments.

I am no politician or economist but if it’s true that more money can be generated by growth than cuts, shouldn’t we be doing that?

What the millionaires said

And here is another bit of serendipity. You will know from last week’s newsround that I recently attended a workshop delivered by 3 multi-millionaires, 2 of who were involved in property. They told us all that the worldwide recession had no effect on them at all. They said investment is all about following the movement. It makes no difference to them if the economy moves up or down, they make the same amount of money.

They ventured that belt tightening is a myth to make the public pay while the usual suspects still make shed loads of dosh. Bear in mind this was millionaire investors saying this, not socialists.

This seems to make sense. While housing benefit is being cut and rents are going through the roof bankers are still awarding themselves massive bonuses. Shouldn’t we be investing our way out of this crisis rather than treating out national economy like house-keeping money?

As I learned on last week’s workshop, how much you have isn’t as important as how you manage it.

Churchill famously visited a bombed out East End in 1940, flashing his ‘V’ sign and said “We can take it”, to which a ‘luvable cockernee’ woman shouted back “You aint taking it mister, we are”, a comment conveniently airbrushed out of Churchillian history.

The great and the good of this country can wave the flag of cuts to the economy in a duplicitous attempt to recreate the ‘Blitz spirit’ but where are they taking the financial hits in their lives? They aren’t, we are!

And so back to Bob.

Proponents of Nimbyism cluster around vague ideas about tower blocks being built on cricket pitches, thatched cottages being bull-dozed to make way for an Arndale Centre, the 300 year old George and Dragon becoming a ‘Maccy D’s’ as we call them in my manor, but we can build and convert without doing this.

Colonel Bob pointed this out in his Radio 4 interview. While celebrating his Tory heartland constituency’s leafier environs he did emphasise that there were still areas that could be creatively developed without turning the area into Kidbrooke/Mosside/Skelmersdale (delete as applicable) and I agree heartily with him.

Some exciting projects

floating cityCheck out the inventive conversion work being done by Knott Architects or the fantastic regeneration projects of Urban Splas  turning forgotten and unloved spaces into homes that rebuild communities. Or why not simply put a hut on your roof?

Or check this week’s idea from former Google Engineer Patri Friedman and his design for a floating city

We don’t have to tarmac over forests, or wipe out centuries of history to build our way out of this housing shortage, we have loads of spaces, we just need to get creative about using them. Believe it or not, I actually don’t have a problem with Grant Shapps’s boats idea. I don’t think it will provide anywhere near the amount of homes he suggests but that kind of lateral thinking is actually what we need.

And ‘outside the box’ thinking is very unusual for him. Who knows, maybe back in the 1990s he was ‘Largin it’ next to me, referee’s whistle in mouth with a glow stick in one hand and a bottle of water in the other on the dance floors of the Ministry of Sound, Megatripolis and Club UK and his brain got turned!!!!!!  [Steady on … Ed]

Ben Reeve Lewis

Follow Ben on twitterBen has started Home Saving Expert, to share his secrets to defending people’s homes from mortgage repossession Visit his blog and get some help and advice on mortgage difficulties and catch up with him on Twitter and check out his free report “An Encouraging note on Dealing with your Mortgage Lender” and have it sent right to your inbox.

House building picture Martin Pettit, floating city from OdeatoaLivingsoul

Previous Post
Next Post

Filed Under: News and comment

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Reader Interactions

Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Comments

  1. JS says

    September 9, 2011 at 10:46 am

    Hmm, dunno about Shapps and raving. He looks more like in the early 90s he was waltzin’ it up in the pit to Carcass or Morbid Angel or Bolt Thrower or S.O.D. Don’t ask me why.

    Actually, I think Shapps gets a lot of unfair snark to be fair and I suspect a lot of it is due to inverse snobbery. He does seem quite preoccupied in general with the issue of homelessness, from what I’ve read, and does seem to be making some effort to deal with things (although I’m still not entirely convinced by his views on the housing benefit cap).

  2. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    September 9, 2011 at 11:31 am

    I disagree JS, I dont think he has a clue. Everyone in housing knows the core problems but he avoids tackling them in any meaningful way. Decisive action in key areas are what is required.

    It is traditional to mock ministers but we do occasionaly get examples of people in post who know what they are doing and he aint one of ’em.

    GIven where housing is at the moment I think it should be an in cabinet post like defence….which is next door to de-gate haha

    And I also disagree about his musical past too. I’m sure I remember swapping phone numbers with him in the chill out room at The Zapp and promising to be best friends for ever

  3. JS says

    September 9, 2011 at 3:08 pm

    I can see that coming out in the tabloids… “Yes, I took E’s when younger but I didn’t swallow them.”

  4. Ben Reeve Lewis says

    September 10, 2011 at 9:30 am

    Haha, or “I took Es but didnt dance”

  5. Tessa Shepperson says

    September 10, 2011 at 9:40 am

    Thats enough comments on Shapps please – I don’t want to be sued for libel

  6. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    September 12, 2011 at 3:55 pm

    Haha alright we’ll leave him alone.

    Bouyed by my research into planning our way out of a crisis I came across this rather excellent blog http://andrewlainton.wordpress.com/2011/08/28/developers-build-up-landbanks-without-planning-permission-ahead-of-nppf-telegraph-2/ Andrew Lainton is closely watching the relaxation of planning laws and keeping everyone informed.

    It turns out that the bigger developers buy land without planning permission and store it for possible future use. New planning regs suggest the permission can ‘Be presumed’ in certain circumstances and although the homes are needed more in inner city a lot of the strategic land banks are on the edge of leafy villages. Hmmm!

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list and get a free eBook
Sign up

Post updates

Never miss another post!
Sign up to our Post Updates or the monthly Round Up
Sign up

Worried about insurance?

Insurance Course

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get a free eBook

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2026 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy