• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Act 2025
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

Accelerated possession proceedings defences #8

This post is more than 13 years old

November 30, 2011 by Tessa Shepperson

The notice was served before the tenancy agreement was signed

Serve notices after the tenancy is signedWhen I mapped out this series, I had forgotten about this point, and I was reminded of it by something someone said in one of the comments.

It is quite common for a landlord or agent to arrange to serve the section 21 notice at the start of the tenancy.

Then the thing is done, and they will not be at risk of finding that, at the end of the fixed term, it has been overlooked and that they will have to wait a further two months before getting the property back.

However unfortunately you need to be a bit careful. My advice is that you should NEVER serve the notice at the time of signing the tenancy, but always at least one day later.

Its a bit reminiscent of the old section 20 notices, but in reverse. Section 20 notices had to served before the tenancy was entered into, and therefore landlords were warned to leave at least a day between serving the notice and signing the tenant up.

Here it is different – here the notice needs to be served AFTER the tenancy is signed, as you cannot serve a notice to end a tenancy which has not started yet.

The thing is though, if the two documents are dated the same date, you will have difficulty in proving the order in which things happened.

The Judge (in a claim for possession based on section 21) might be happy with your evidence saying that the tenant had signed the tenancy before the notice was served. But then again he might believe the tenant who said it was served earlier.

It is possible that he may not think it’s an important point. We have not had a case on this issue (to my knowledge).

But personally I wouldn’t risk it. The best way to prove the order in which things are done is to have them dated with a different date. If your tenancy is signed and dated on 1 January and the section 21 notice is signed as received on 2 January, the problem cannot arise.

It takes a long time to bring a claim for possession. If you lose, then you will have to start all over again which could take six to eight months or more. You may even be ordered to pay your tenants legal costs.

Its worth the extra trouble of serving the section 21 notice a bit later.

Previous Post
Next Post

Filed Under: Tips and How to Tagged With: possession claims

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Reader Interactions

Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Comments

  1. Simon Parrott says

    November 30, 2011 at 8:39 am

    This is an issue that I have dealt with for some of my Letting Agent clients whose policy is to deal with s21 at the outset.

    Remember that the s21 Notice cannot be a valid one until the Deposit has been protected

    My suggestion is that the way to deal with this is for a checklist to be prepared for the Agent to work through on grant of the tenancy. This contains an entry for completing the AST agreement and giving a completed copy to Tenant. The next entry deals with protecting the Deposit (which should be done online there and then, either by transmission to DPS or TDS/MyDeposiits)and giving relevant Prescribed Information to the Tenant. The next entry is signing s21 Notice on behalf of Landlord and giving to Tenant. This is followed by getting Tenant to sign a receipt for the s21 Notice which specifically states that the notice was given and received after the Tenant had been given the signed AST and the Prescribed Information on Deposit Protection.

    This receipt should therefore cover this possible defence. The checklist, backed up by a statement from the Agent that these steps were undertaken in the correct order, ought to seal the issue for the judge if there is such a defence

    Unfortunatley this may not be sufficient to stop the court giving a hearing on an accelerated claim if such a defence is raised

  2. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    November 30, 2011 at 8:52 am

    Great point Tessa and one I find some housing advisers miss too.

    Another good reason for not serving an S21 right away relates to deposit protection. The landlord has 2 weeks from receiving the deposit (rising to 30 days under the Localism Act) to protect the deposit but a S21 isnt valid unless the deposit was protected before service of notice.

    In our office we always check dates of service and protection as a homelessness prevention tool to shoot the notice down

  3. darrel says

    November 30, 2011 at 10:39 am

    Just thinking aloud, which may not be the brightest thing to do, but a notice is deemed serve the day after.

    For example, if I pop down to the property today, hand delivered the notice to the tenant, it would be deemed served tomorrow.

    Does that have any effect on the notice being given on the same date as the tenancy starting?

  4. Tessa Shepperson says

    November 30, 2011 at 10:56 am

    Thanks everyone for your comments. Simon, I like the idea of the agents check list, I may well do one.

    @Darrel – feel free to think aloud on the blog – thats all I am doing a lot of the time ;)

    However if the notice is handed to the tenant before 4.30 it will be deemed served that day. Plus of course as Ben and Simon have said, there is the issue of the deposit to be dealt with.

    My feeling is that it is best to serve the notice at least a week after the tenancy has been signed. A good time might be the first inspection visit, when it can be delivered by hand.

  5. Ed Cracknell says

    November 30, 2011 at 1:03 pm

    Hi Tessa

    Love the blog and agree with your advice.

    Where does the deemed service point come from though? I wasn’t aware there was any deemed service provision that applies to section 21 notices.

  6. Tessa Shepperson says

    November 30, 2011 at 1:23 pm

    @Ed thanks for your comment and glad you like the blog.

    Re service – there is a section in CPR rule 6 which applies to documents which are not claim forms. I generally act on the basis that this will apply to notices 9 (as they will be a material document in possession proceedings) – or can you point me to something which says otherwise?

  7. Simon Parrott says

    December 1, 2011 at 8:38 am

    I’m not sure that you can rely on CPR6.20 as a deeming provision for documents that are not part of the court process. Certainly it is persuasive, but not conclusive.

    Bear in mind s196 Law of Property Act 1925, s23 Landlord & Tenant Act 1927 and s7 Interpretation Act 1978, all of which provide for a deemed service in cases where notices are served by recorded delivery, even if not actually collected by the Tenant. These were all considered in Blunden v Frogmore in 2002, although that was in the context of a commercial property.

    It will all depend on the attitude of the DJ at the relevant hearing. I think, the best way to try to deem service of a s21 notice is to send it by recorded delivery, but this is still no substitute for a hand delivered notice backed up by a recepit or statement of service

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list and get a free eBook
Sign up

Post updates

Never miss another post!
Sign up to our Post Updates or the monthly Round Up
Sign up

Worried about insurance?

Insurance Course

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get a free eBook

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2025 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy