• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Act 2025
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

Ben Reeve Lewis Friday Newsround #165

This post is more than 11 years old

August 8, 2014 by Ben Reeve-Lewis

Ben on a chair[Ben Reeve Lewis talks about training …]

I did my first training course 16 years ago.

I was called with my then manager to train the Met police on landlord tenant law for a 2 hour session at the police training centre.

My manager did the first hour on the law and I did the second on the world of landlords and tenants.

I was horrified to stand in the wings for her bit.

She didn’t understand anything about presentation and sat with her legs crossed talking for an hour about the law, entirely immune to the yawns, funny looks, giggles, even rolled up balls of paper they were throwing at each other like bored schoolchildren.

When I got up to do my bit I knew I had to recover the situation, so I said breezily

“The law is funny thing you know? When I first started this job I thought it was just a matter of someone breaking the law and you prosecute them”

“I didn’t know how hard it is to actually get enough evidence to get someone into court”

“Now I know different .”

“Its so frustrating watching criminals walk. It’s no wonder that you lot fit people up from time to time”.

There was a horrible second of silence when I thought I’d cracked a joke too far and then the audience dissolved into laughter and I had them with me for the next hour.

Trainer lesson number one: People learn best when they are having fun.

Fraudsters in Brighton

It seems that down in Brighton they have had no such problems with getting enough evidence to arrest a bunch of fraudsters.

Inside Housing told us this week of 4 men arrested over a £10 million scam over property management contracts improperly awarded by the council.
More arrests are expected and I would imagine those to be within council employees, past and or present.

Councils aren’t immune to such stuff.

No bungs for Ben

Makes me wonder though. In all my years I have never even been offered a bung, let alone had to consider the moral quandary it might pose over the weekend, weighing up the risk of getting caught against the outstanding gas bill.

Unless you count the lovely Jamaican lady last year who bought me a bottle of whisky for helping her reclaim her flat from cannabis farmers.

I think even my councillors would ignore that.

Vote of no confidence

The article also contained a link to another article about Brighton Council  where residents have flagged up a vote of no confidence in the way Brighton manages its social housing and called for the housing committee to be scrapped.

Quite an extraordinary development in council land. People put up with all sorts of inefficiency and crap from their local authority so you’d have to go some to get a result like that. Gawd alone knows what’s going on there. One for Rotten Boroughs in Private Eye methinks.

Or maybe the long suffering denizens of Brighton are fitting them up. Watch this space.

Garden cities

This week I did two day’s homelessness training in Letchworth Garden City, happily without inappropriate jokes. It was the first time I had been to any Garden City.

I didn’t get to see much of it but read up on them before I went and was quietly impressed by the ethos.

Towns designed for living in where the mortgage and rental profits are ploughed back into the community. A socialist idyll without a donkey jacket or Tom Paxton fisherman’s cap to be seen anywhere.

Government compensation

Government are bigging them up again and I read with some astonishment in The Guardian this week that homeowners could be compensated by government if a Garden city is built next door to them.

Well known spineless Cameron sidekick Nick Clegg, upon announcing plans to build the things said of existing local property owners, said:

“We could maybe give deductions on their council tax for the period of time during which the garden city’s being built. We could possibly also say to those homes where they think the price of their home will be affected, we will guarantee the price of their home by buying it, if you like, upfront.”

Have you been to Letchworth? It’s a nice green, safe and attractive environment. A little sleepy for my Old Kent Road tastes but hardly something that will bring down the price of your house.

Could it be that he is concerned about votes in conservative heartlands like rural Hertfordshire?

Spineless sidekick

If compensating people for the inconvenience of building something large near them is a point of principle then is he going to announce plans to pay compensation to the residents of Walworth Road or Elephant and Castle while “One the elephant” is being built before being sold off to Chinese investors?
Is he bollocks.

I always hated the way that Liberals got ridiculed in comedy sketches for being wishy-washy and ineffectual, by nature leaning towards old style liberal philanthropy as a genuine third way political system but Clegg plays straight into the hands of stand up comedians the length and breadth of the land.

Grow a pair man, strap one on and if you are determined to be a side kick all your life at least get a hat. It never did Walter Brennan any harm.

Speaking of Boris’s Baby, One the Elephant I read something this week that made me double check that it wasn’t April 1st.

Poor doors

 

An article, again in the Guardian, where it has been suggested that in order for social housing tenants be included in new build developments that are part owned, there should be what are termed “Poor Doors”.

Separate entrances for social housing people.

Whilst saying he didn’t like them he didn’t come out and say he would ban them. He in fact commented:

“The difficulty is, and this is what the developers will say, is that the high charges, the concierge charges, the charges for all the services in the building, cannot always be met in a uniform way by all the tenants, and that’s why they make this case for dual access”.

So any sense of social fairness or even an acceptance that we live in the 21st century and not Downton Abbey gets swept aside in case we upset the all-powerful property developers?

Labour’s David Lammy commented, quite rightly in my book:

“It belonged “more in a Dickens novel than in a 21st-century global city, this is a case of Londoners living side by side, but completely divided by bricks, mortar and money.

Them and Us

As a kid my family were £10 Poms. Emigrating to Australia on the SS Iberia. We were all in what was termed ‘Tourist Class’ at the back of the ship and not allowed in first class but I used to look through the open doors and couldn’t see the difference.

It perplexed me. The deck was the same colour, they looked like my family. The ate, swam in the pools that looked exactly like the ones we had in tourist class and yet to step one inch over the line would get a porter/steward/jack tar shushing you back to pleb land.

I just didn’t see what was so different about them and us that I wasn’t allowed to even talk to them.

It would appear that this is creeping back into society as a whole.

Where next then? Terry Thomas? Henley Regatta v. Tubby Isaacs jellied Eel stall? Toothless Pearly Kings, smiling and gullible but happy?

Poor Doors???????? Sorry, still shaking my head at that one. I feel as if I have fallen through a wormhole into a Pathe Newsreel and am sharing a seat on the Clapham omnibus with Noel Coward.

See ya next week

Previous Post
Next Post

Filed Under: News and comment

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Reader Interactions

Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Comments

  1. Simon says

    August 8, 2014 at 8:50 am

    The delicious irony about garden cities – or at least the Ebenezer Howard model of garden cities – is that they were only possible because Howard could buy development land at agricultural values. Since the 1947 Town & Country Planning Act created our lovely planning system this is no longer possible!

  2. HB Welcome says

    August 8, 2014 at 10:00 am

    Look past the social indignation of poor doors and ask yourself- Who ultimately pays?

    I’m happy to pay for adequate housing for the genuine needy but that doesn’t stretch to concierge service, marble hallways and golden fountains.

  3. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    August 8, 2014 at 6:00 pm

    No HB…lets NOT look past social indignation.

    Forget who pays and lets ask the question “Are poor doors an acceptable concept now that we dont live in the 18th century?”

    David Lammeys comment about it talked of people separated by Bricks, Mortar and money. If you are going to drill down into who pays you make his argument very efficiently.

    The nub of the issue isnt who pays, or even poor doors to be honest. It is a social ethos so f**ked up that these arguments even take place.

    It isnt a housing issue, it is merely a side effect of a society obssessed with money, celebrity and status to the exclusion of compassion, understanding and bereft of intelligence.

    it cant be solved by housing because it is simply an expression of a societal malaise.

    And yes…..I know this response makes me sound like some disillusioned hippy but as Nick Lowe once sang…and I’ve quoted this before “Whats so funny bout peace love and understanding?”

    Bring on the ridicule…..I’m up for it

  4. just saying says

    August 8, 2014 at 9:19 pm

    Oh Ben, love it. Just one thing: Pls don’t ever apologise for being a big hippy; who puts compassion, understanding and intelligence first.

  5. HB Welcome says

    August 10, 2014 at 12:42 pm

    Dear Disillusioned Hippy,

    Nothing wrong with peace, love and understanding but it doesn’t build homes.

    Economic reality does.

    Section 106 means the rich pay for housing the poor. The rich pay more for a separate entrance.
    The poor (and the taxpayer) don’t pay service charges for fripperies they don’t need.

    “Are poor doors an acceptable concept?”

    Yes, the upside outweighs the downside.
    Mildly distasteful perhaps but no different to some turning left when boarding a plane.
    Some is rich, some is poor, that’s the way the world is.

  6. HB Welcome says

    August 10, 2014 at 12:44 pm

    I had to laugh at this advertisement though;

    http://www.onetheelephant.com/facilities/development-features

    “Equipped with a 24 hour concierge, the reception area of One The Elephant will be a large, informal and welcoming space with distinctive design features including comfortable seating, library feature walls and a green wall– the perfect place to meet your friends and neighbours.“

  7. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    August 10, 2014 at 4:46 pm

    Jeez, my favourite from the sales blurb is “There is also a ‘green roof’ for growing produce, and a communal reading garden linking the tower with the pavilion.”

    An allotment in the sky where residents with a double first from Cambridge can read Proust’s ‘A la recherche du temp perdus’ among organically grown cabbages whilst looking down on the Walworth road and pondering how insignificant it all is haha.

    As for economic realities? There’s plenty of that going on in Gaza right now. Doesnt make the system workable, fair or even plain old ‘Right’.

    Like I said HB ‘Poor Doors’ and ‘Who pays’ are just diagnostic symptoms of a society way out of whack with humanity.

    You dont have to be a socialist or a communist (and I am neither) to be concerned about fairness or the understandably human notion that if I earn more than you I should be entitled to better treatment.

    Remember that Harry Enfield Character? The rich Brummie? Proclaiming in every sketch how “I am considerably richer than yo”

    Funny. But not in the real world and sitting in Business class on BA dopes even go near comparing basic stuff like housing need with a choice of flight based on price.

    The consumer comparison never works for me for housing.

    Right now in Detroit there is a massive how do you do going on over individuals and companies who havent paid their water bills. The companies are disconnecting, when the city lives near to the great lakes. Who decided these companies own the water? What gives them the right to stop people drinking or keeping their communities clean just because they ‘Cant pay’?

    Turning left on the plane? No comparison when it comes to basic human need

  8. HB Welcome says

    August 10, 2014 at 8:15 pm

    You’ve nailed it for me right there Ben.

    Concierge service, marble hallways etc aren’t a basic human need.

    I don’t get your wider societal indignation and I don’t buy Lammy’s mayoral vote posturing.

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list and get a free eBook
Sign up

Post updates

Never miss another post!
Sign up to our Post Updates or the monthly Round Up
Sign up

Worried about insurance?

Insurance Course

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get a free eBook

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2026 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy