• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Act 2025
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

Ben Reeve Lewis Friday Newsround #226

This post is more than 10 years old

October 23, 2015 by Ben Reeve-Lewis

Ben on a chair[Ben Reeve Lewis is thinking of manning the phones …]

I got a call this week from a very young sounding Labour party member asking me if I would be prepared to spend an evening here and there manning the phones in Euston to answer calls on Sadiq Khan for his bid to be London Mayor.

I said I would in principal but couldn’t commit to specific times or dates and I also said I don’t know enough about his policies to answer queries in detail, to which he replied “That’s alright, don’t worry about it”.

Hmmmm. Doubt I’ll be of much use then.

Caller: What is Mr Khan’s stance on abortion?
Me: I have no idea.
Caller: Well where does he stand on the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership?
Me: Beats me, I only know his housing stuff.

Doesn’t sound the best way to run a Mayoral campaign but if it helps stop the blonde buffoon’s sell off of the capital’s assets to his foreign investor mates, then so be it.

Here and Boston

I don’t know about you but I’ve been loving the viral you tube clip of that woman on Question Time tearfully attacking government over cuts to working tax credit and the thoroughly ashamed look on the MPs face who was lost for words.

She talks of being the working family obediently doing Iain Duncan-Smith’s “Right thing” only to find she is being squeezed even more and I was interested to read that the same phenomenon is going on in Boston.

The housing shortage there as reported in the article is squeezing out the working middle people, leaving Boston a city for the rich and the very poor on benefits, while those in the middle are forced to move out because of housing costs.

A bit like London then and more to the point, a bit like me and Frazzy. Two self-employed, hard working people with reasonable incomes forced to relocate from the city of our birth by unaffordable housing costs.

A cunning plan

I don’t know where we’ll end up yet but I fancy France and I reckon if Frazzy and I, with her mum in her wheelchair, storm the Channel Tunnel at Dover, while everyone is looking at the other end, we might just make it through.

A cunning plan don’t you think?

Alternatively I could make a homeless application and get relocated for free to an area outside London. This practice is becoming more widespread as reported by the BBC this week.

A rock and a hard place

It’s a story that resurfaces regularly in the popular press as a piece of council bashing.

Waltham Forest Council (Ignore the name, its in the middle of London) has placed 57 families in Luton and according to the article, 20 other London boroughs have been busy relocating homeless families in Milton Keynes, Basildon, Thurrock and Slough.

Shelter’s Campbell Robb says:

“Uprooting homeless families and sending them away from their jobs, schools and support networks should only ever be a last resort, but shockingly it’s now the norm in London”

And at the personal end of things relocated mum Nicola Chapman who fetched up in Luton back in June said:

“I’m not happy at the moment, it is giving me really bad anxiety. Also, I am having to take one of my children to school every morning and it is a 40 minute walk away.

I have no friends or family around here. I hope I get moved very quickly. The flat is tiny, it is more like a studio flat. It is very distressing for all of us”

Now lets examine the basic equation that drives this.

  • If a person is owed a homelessness duty the council have to deal with them.
  • It is illegal to place families in B&B for more than 6 weeks. Shelter and government jump up and down when this comes to light.
  • Market rents in London are extremely high.
  • Benefit cuts mean that families cant afford the rents.

So in order to stop out of borough placements and bring people home do you:

  • Enforce rent capping?
  • Abolish the benefit cap?
  • Strike out the 6 week rule for B&B?

In the absence of any solutions, homelessness units have little choice but to send people to more affordable areas.

Complaining that councils are letting people down is not pointing the finger at the source of the problem, its just easier to write about “Those pesky councils again….Doh!”

Something wrong in London?

Look also at the latest DCLG figures for homelessness in the second quarter of 2015.

Whilst the rest of England has seen only a 1% rise compared to the same quarter in 2014, London has seen a 12.5% increase and the amount of families placed in temporary accommodation in the capital accounts for a whopping 74% of the national total.

So something is going wrong down here don’t you think?

Pop up housing for the homeless

My old employers, Lewisham council, have steadfastly refused to do out of borough placements (apart from a few special cases) and instead proposed last year to build a pop up homeless village and I hear its still going ahead.

Sounds quite cosy huh? Conjuring images of the Hobbit village in Lord of the Rings or something more chocolate boxy, a pop-up being like one of those children’s books or Christmas Cards, although I doubt it will look like that.

The Lewisham Mayor Sir Steve Bullock points out:

“Like all local authorities, Lewisham has a range of redevelopment sites, some of which are currently vacant while longer-term regeneration plans are developed and subsequently shaped in conjunction with residents. Often the lead times on larger scale regeneration sites mean they can be vacant for three to four years”.

Big Steve’s idea is to use the space while the longer term plans are worked up, quoting some impressive figures:

“Our feasibility work shows that it would be financially viable to deploy a building, move it twice within 10 years and subsequently move it to a final location at that point”

Go Steve-o. I like a radical idea.

What made me smile this week

Finding out about Giethoorn, a town in Holland that has no roads, only canals and it has to be about the prettiest place you could imagine.

Very popular with Chinese tourists apparently who flock each year in the hundreds of thousands.

Presumably in the hope of buying it and building a power station.

See ya next week

Previous Post
Next Post

Filed Under: News and comment

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Reader Interactions

Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Comments

  1. Rent Rebel says

    October 23, 2015 at 6:50 pm

    “Alternatively I could make a homeless application and get relocated for free to an area outside London.”

    But you’d have to first prove Priority Need Ben :)

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list and get a free eBook
Sign up

Post updates

Never miss another post!
Sign up to our Post Updates or the monthly Round Up
Sign up

Worried about insurance?

Insurance Course

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get a free eBook

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2026 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy