• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Act 2025
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

Tessa Shepperson Newsround #46

This post is more than 7 years old

April 20, 2018 by Tessa Shepperson

Another week of landlord & tenant related news.

The MP’s report

Suddenly everyone in politics seems to be waking up to the things Ben and I have been writing about for years.

The latest report is from The Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee and I have finally been able to locate it here.

I have not had time to read it yet, but according to the Property Industry Eye post it reports as follows.

Although most tenants are happy, a “significant minority” of rental properties are “shockingly inadequate” with some 800,000 private rental homes having at least one Category One hazard.

However, enforcement is far too low with six out of ten councils not prosecuting a landlord in 2016.  The reason for this (surprise surprise) is that Councils cannot afford the high cost of bringing a prosecution, particularly when fines are very low.

So although new Council enforcement powers are welcome, they are “meaningless if local authorities do not, or cannot, enforce them”.

The report calls for

  • Greater legal protection for tenants against retaliatory eviction, rent increases and harassment;
  • A new fund to support local councils undertaking enforcement activities;
  • Informing tenants and landlords of their rights and responsibilities;
  • Requiring local authorities to publish their enforcement strategies online;
  • A new housing court;
  • A review of existing legislation relating to the private rented sector to see whether it can be simplified

Well, we will have to see.  Incidentally the Law Commission, after a long project, made proposals for a simplified system way back in about 2006 but it was ignored by Government (although part of the proposals are being implemented in Wales).

John Healey and Labour’s Green Paper

There has also been an article by John Healey announcing a new Green Paper setting out what Labour would propose doing about housing which you can read in the Guardian here.

Proposals will (according to the article) include:

  • building 1m genuinely affordable homes over 10 years
  • the biggest council housebuilding programme for over 30 years
  • redefining ‘affordable housing’
  • stoping the sell-off of 50,000 social rented homes a year by suspending the right to buy
  • ending all conversions to “affordable rent” and
  • scrapping the government’s plans to force councils to sell the best of their homes
  • transforming the planning system with a new duty to deliver affordable homes,
  • creating an English Sovereign Land Trust to make more land available more cheaply
  • ending the “viability” loophole that lets commercial developers dodge their obligation to deliver affordable homes.
  • backing councils, housing associations and community providers with the funding and flexibility to build big for their communities, and (after Grenfell)
  • making safe homes for all the very highest priority

Big plans.  We shall see.  They have to get elected first.  NB I can’t seem to find a link to the green paper itself so if you know where it is can you put a link in the comments?

Grenfell – the fatal renovation

Turning to safety and Grenfell, new shocking reports are showing that the problems which caused the tragedy were largely down to recent renovations.

“Deficiencies” introduced during renovation works included poorly installed fire barriers, gaps around window frames, and flammable cladding and insulation.  Had this work not been done, the report suggests, deaths could have been avoided.

Words fail me really.  Read the article for more information.

The Guardians take on this is that David Cameron’s assault on ‘red tape’ is largely to blame.

They also refer to the massive reduction in value of properties in other tower blocks – for example, the case of Cecile Langevin whose flat has fallen in value from £475,000 to £50,000.

The land of opportunity

The Private Rented Sector is indeed a place of contrasts.  While the MPs report shows that some 28% of tenants who have experienced problems do not complain due to fear of eviction, other reports show that the number of buy-to-let investors is increasing rather than decreasing – despite the tax changes which everyone said would drive landlords away.

According (the report says) to recent HMRC data, the number of buy-to-let investors in the UK rose to a record high of 2.5million in the latest tax year – an increase of 5% on 2016/17 and a rise of 27% over the past five years.

Buy to let is, it seems, considered more of an opportunity than a threat – although this is largely due to the dismal performance of other investment types.

Another report shows that there has been an increase in the number of build to rent homes.

Windrush and Right to Rent – mandatory racism?

Finally, an opinion piece by Ros Renshaw in Property Industry Eye calls for an immediate suspension of Right to Rent while the whole ‘hostile environment’ policy is re-examined.

She points out that letting agents can be fined or even prosecuted under the right to rent rules if they let a property to someone without proper paperwork.  However

many of the Windrush generation – children of parents specifically invited to come to this country – have no papers that can prove they have been legally living here, contributing to our society and paying taxes, for years.

The fiasco means that without documentation, they cannot prove they have any right to rent, or to work, or to receive hospital treatment.

The system, she says,

comes perilously close to legalised, indeed almost mandatory, racism.

Very true.  Right to rent is also due to be challenged by judicial review so we shall have to see what happens.

News round will be back next week.

Previous Post
Next Post

Filed Under: News and comment

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Reader Interactions

Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Comments

  1. hbWelcome says

    April 20, 2018 at 12:56 pm

    The main headline from this MP’s report has been the shocking 800,000 private rental homes having at least one Category One hazard.

    Doubtless this will be used as justification for more pointless, unenforceable legislation.

    So whilst I don’t condone the private rental properties with cat 1 hazards, it needs to be put in proportion.

    There are also a shocking 400,000 social rental homes having at least one Category One hazard, (despite the social housing stock being much newer).

    There are also a shocking 3.5 million owner occupier homes with at least one Category One hazard. (Are they ‘rogue’ owner occupiers?)

    The report also omits to mention that from the beginning of this month, 400,000 of the worst energy performing private rental properties will have to be improved, exempted or removed from the market.

    Source; https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/feb/05/landlords-draughty-homes-ban

  2. hbWelcome says

    April 21, 2018 at 9:31 am

    “the number of buy-to-let investors is increasing rather than decreasing – despite the tax changes which everyone said would drive landlords away.
    According (the report says) to recent HMRC data, the number of buy-to-let investors in the UK rose to a record high of 2.5million in the latest tax year – an increase of 5% on 2016/17”

    Do you have a source for this recent HMRC data because it just does not add up with what I’m seeing.

    Firstly, how do HMRC know BTL investors have increased 5% on 2016/17? The tax year only ended a fortnight ago!
    How do they know any increase is not due to more landlords now declaring for the first time due to increased rents?
    Are any increased numbers due to ‘face-washing’ BTLers selling up and declaring for the first time with a capital gain?
    How does the increasing number of BTLers claim square with the very reliable BofE data that BTL lending is significantly and consistently down?

    Source;
    https://www.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2018/3/bank-of-england-issues-gloomy-buy-to-let-mortgage-lending-figures

    • Tessa Shepperson says

      April 21, 2018 at 9:38 am

      That was from a Landlord Today report which I forgot to link to. Its here https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2018/4/rise-in-uk-landlords-shows-there-is-still-an-appetite-for-buy-to-let

      • hbWelcome says

        April 21, 2018 at 10:48 am

        Thanks Tessa.

        “an increase of 5% on 2016/17”
        Clearly they’ve got things wrong as HMRC don’t have the 2017/18 data to compare it to and they won’t have until the end of Jan 2019.

        The BofE figures are a true reflection of what is happening.

  3. Peter Jackson says

    April 21, 2018 at 1:10 pm

    I could make a case for Tony Blair being responsible for Grenfell as good and accurate as the Guardian’s one blaming David Cameron. i.e verry poor and inaccurate. Fire inspection regulations were cut in 2005.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/theresa-may-grenfell-tower-fire-labour-blame-blair-labour-jeremy-corbyn-pmqs-live-a7812726.html

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list and get a free eBook
Sign up

Post updates

Never miss another post!
Sign up to our Post Updates or the monthly Round Up
Sign up

Worried about insurance?

Insurance Course

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get a free eBook

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2026 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy