• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

What happens if I stay on in my shared property after the fixed term ends?

This post is more than 6 years old

September 9, 2019 by Tessa Shepperson

flatHere is a question to the blog clinic fast track from Richard (not his real name) who is a tenant

Here is the background of our situation

1. Persons A, B and myself signed a joint AST contract which expires in about 9 days
2. Persons A has decided to move out by the expiry date and has looked for a new tenant (C) to replace him.
3. I am in the process of buying a property and therefore don’t want to sign a new fixed term 12-month contract with 6-month break clause. I am hoping that I will have the completion in about two to six weeks time
4. Estate Agent sent us a Section 21 Eviction Notice 2 months prior to the tenancy expiry date as a precaution

I was wondering if I still have the right to remain in the flat if I refuse to sign any new AST contract? Since Person A has decided to move out and has found someone (C) to replace him, will I still be automatically on a rolling contract if I don’t sign anything?

I haven’t let the estate agent know that I am buying a flat yet as I am trying to buy as much time as possible before they decide to proceed with the eviction process. I am hoping that I will be able to move into my new place by the time they manage to go to court for this.

What would you advise me to do in this situation? The estate agent hasn’t in fact given us a new contract to sign yet and I wonder what will happen if I don’t do anything at all and remain in the flat after the current joint AST contract expires.

Thank you!

Answer

If you remain in the property after the fixed term ends (ie if the landlord does not get vacant possession) then section 5 of the Housing Act 1988 will apply. This says:

Tenants are entitled to remain after the end of the fixed term and that if they do a periodic tenancy will arise. This is created by s5 of the Housing Act 1988 (which is why it is called a ‘statutory periodic tenancy).

  • It will start as soon as the fixed term ends
  • It will be between the same parties
  • It will be for the same premises
  • The ‘periods’ will be the same as those for which rent was last paid
  • The terms and conditions of the preceding tenancy agreement will apply (other than clauses about ending the tenancy)

The only time where this will not happen is if your tenancy provides for a ‘contractual’ periodic tenancy – you need to check your tenancy agreement to find out if it does.

What section 5 means is that after the end of your tenancy:

  • There will be a monthly periodic tenancy (assuming you pay rent monthly)
  • It will be between your landlord and yourself along with A and B
  • C cannot become a tenant, even if B moves out and C moves in, as C has not signed a tenancy agreement with the landlord. If C moves in he will probably be an unauthorised lodger and technically B will still be liable for rent
  • If you have a contractual periodic tenancy it will work in a similar way

This can continue indefinitely until either all the tenants move out (giving the landlord vacant possession) or the landlord obtains a court order for possession and you are evicted by the Bailiffs or High Court Enforcement Officers.

This would probably take the landlord around three to six months (assuming they have complied with all the s21 prerequisites and so are in a position to serve a valid notice). So you should be out by then.

No new tenancy agreement can be signed without your agreement while the periodic tenancy continues.

However, you will be jointly and severally liable for ALL the rent – so if, for example, the other tenants move out and you remain on your own – the landlord will expect you to pay all the rent, not just ‘your’ portion. The other tenants will also technically be liable but they will have gone.

What you could do

1 Stay in the property until you know that your sale is going through.

2. Serve a ‘tenants Notice to Quit’ on your landlord giving him not less than one ‘period’ notice.

Strictly speaking, your notice period should expire on the last day of the next full period. So if the period runs from the 15th day of the month to the 14th – your notice should end on the next 14th day after one month after the date you serve the notice (NB we have an advice guide for tenants on this here).

Assuming you have moved out by the date given in the notice, that will end your liability under the tenancy. Indeed it will end the tenancy itself (a Notice to Quit served by one of joint tenants during a periodic tenancy ends the tenancy for everyone) and the remaining occupiers will need to reach a new agreement with the landlord – but that will not be your concern. You will have left.

Be careful though about remaining in the property after the expiry of your notice to quit as there is a very ancient law that says the landlord can claim double rent from you.

Previous Post
Next Post

Filed Under: Clinic

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Reader Interactions

Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Comments

  1. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    September 9, 2019 at 11:00 am

    An open question on this.

    a statutory periodic tenancy carries all the same protections as a contractual periodic, so what is the point of having 2 types of exactly the same thing?

    Or are they not exactly the same thing?

    Always puzzled me that one.

    • Adam says

      September 9, 2019 at 5:29 pm

      There are lots of little differences between the 2 types of periodic tenancy.
      For example, a contractual periodic tenancy can have rent rise clauses. The tenant can not dispute the rent rises if they are in line with the clauses.
      A contractual without rent rise clauses or a statutory tenancy are subject to sections 13 & 14 of the HA 1988 and the tenant can get a review of any rent rise if they haven’t agreed to it.The landlord also needs to serve the notice correctly.

  2. Tessa Shepperson says

    September 9, 2019 at 11:26 am

    They are not the same. The landlord’s position on liability for Council Tax is better on a contractual periodic and also you can control what the periods actually are.

  3. Ben Reeve-Lewis says

    September 9, 2019 at 11:47 am

    Ah…..knew there must be something

    • Michael Barnes says

      September 9, 2019 at 11:55 pm

      There have also been some perverse judgement about terms of fixed term continuing into the SPT.

  4. John-Paul Keates says

    September 9, 2019 at 3:32 pm

    One quirk of the statutory periodic tenancy arising is that a tenant can’t give notice on the first day of the first period (or during the fixed term).

    So any joint tenant who wants to end their joint tenancy is stuck for at least two additional rental periods.

    Which seems a little unfair, as it means that the 12-month agreement someone signs up for is really a 14-month agreement (unless every occupant moves out before the end of the 12 months.)

    • Michael Barnes says

      September 9, 2019 at 11:53 pm

      Whilst a tenant cannot serve notice to end the tenancy during a fixed term tenancy, it may be that one of joint tenants may be able to serve notice that they do not agree to continue in a SPT or in any replacement tenancy. If they then leave before the end of the fixed term, then it may be that S5(2) Housing Act does not create a SPT.

      This is because
      * S5(2) says “the tenant shall be entitled to remain in possession of the dwelling-house let under that tenancy and, subject to subsection (4) below, his right to possession shall depend upon a periodic tenancy arising by virtue of this section”.
      * Tenant means all the individuals (S45(3)).
      * One of the individuals is clearly not exercising the entitlement to possession and therefore the Tenant is not exercising that entitlement.

Primary Sidebar

Its good to talk

The Clinic in a Nutshell

  • You send us your problem using the Blog Clinic form
  • We post it as a normal blog post and ask readers to comment
  • You agree that you won't hold people responsible (or legally liable) if they give a wrong answer
  • You understand that you may not get any answers - it is up to readers whether they comment or not
  • We won't publish everything - whether or not we publish someone's question is entirely up to us
  • However if you use the Fast Track service you will get your question answered within 14 days or your money back

We may be able to help with problems with:

  • Tenancy agreements
  • Tenancy deposits
  • HMOs
  • Disrepair issues
  • Eviction
  • Harassment
(This is not an exhaustive list!)

However we won’t publish questions on:

    Long leases

  • Commercial tenancies
  • Agricultural tenancies
  • Owner occupier problems
  • Rented properties outside England & Wales UK
  • Neighbour disputes (unless perhaps they are landlord and tenant related)
  • Social housing problems (eg where the local authority or a housing association is your landlord)

So please do not ask question on these topics.

View all blog clinic posts posts Blog Clinic form
Blog Clinic Fast Track

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get a free eBook

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2025 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy