• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Act 2025
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

Do Pre-2026 Tenancy Agreements Still Allow One Month’s Notice?

July 13, 2026 by Tessa Shepperson 2 Comments

Tenants Notices to QuitOne of the difficulties with the Renters’ Rights Act is that it changes the law without always making clear how existing tenancy agreements should be treated.

A good example concerns the notice period for tenants’ notices to quit where the tenancy agreement was signed before 1 May 2026.  Another issue which has cropped up on our Landlord Law members forum.

This issue is about the notice period for tenants’ Notices to Quit. In particular, for tenancies that predate 1 May 2026. Thousands of assured tenancies created before the Act remain in existence.  So this is not merely a transitional curiosity.

Tenancies commencing before 1 May 2026

Prior to that date, the majority of periodic tenancies were monthly periodic tenancies. The correct notice period for these was not less than one month, normally ending at the end of a period of the tenancy.

In fact, it would arguably have been a breach of the consumer law to expect tenants to give a longer notice period.

Under common-law rules, the minimum notice period was generally the same as the tenancy period. So

  • Monthly tenancies required not less than one months notice
  • Quarterly tenancies required not less than three months notice
  • Weekly tenancies required not less than one weeks notice.

The notice period for weekly tenancies was amended by the Protection from Eviction Act section 5 (1)(b),  which provided that in all cases the notice given must not be less than four weeks.

It was not unusual, and indeed was considered good practice, for tenancy agreements to inform tenants of the notice period they had to give.

Tenancies commencing after 1 May 2026

The Renters Rights Act 2025 amended the Protection from Eviction Act in this respect. The relevant provision (a new section 1ZA, now states that a tenant’s notice to quit must be as follows

5 Validity of notices to quit.
…

(1ZA) A notice to quit satisfies this subsection—
(a) where it is given by a tenant in relation to premises let under an assured tenancy, if it is given—
(i) not less than any length of time before the date on which the notice is to take effect, not exceeding two months, that the landlord has agreed to in writing, or
(ii) in the absence of agreement under sub-paragraph (i), not less than two months before the date on which the notice is to take effect;

So the new notice period for tenants notices to Quit is two months unless the parties have agreed otherwise in writing.

The question is –

What happens to older tenancy agreements?

  • Will clauses in pre 1 May 2026 tenancy agreements informing tenants of the correct notice period at that time, constitute the agreement by the landlord in writing to accept a shorter notice period after 1 May 2026, as required by section 5(1ZA)(a)(i) above? Or
  • Did Parliament intend the new Renters Rights Act provisions to override any notice periods given in pre 1 May 2026 tenancy agreements?

The government guidance is unclear on this point and there are arguments both ways.

My feeling is that if tenants offer one month’s notice, landlords should accept this and let them go without requiring an additional month’s rent. Apart from the legal uncertainty, taking a hard line could easily prove uneconomic if the matter were ever litigated.

What do readers think? Have you come across this situation?

Previous Post

Filed Under: News and comment

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Reader Interactions

Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Comments

  1. Alec says

    July 13, 2026 at 3:37 pm

    So two months applies – according to the law – but you don’t think landlords should enforce it lest they get shafted by…the law…?

    Reply
  2. DAVID ABSALOM says

    July 13, 2026 at 5:08 pm

    I am swayed by the part that reads that if a landlord and tenant agree a notice period IN WRITING, if that WRITING was in an earlier AST, it has priority.

    As everyone says, the courts will decide

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list and get a free ebook - 12 Costly Legal Mistakes Every Landlord Should Avoid.
Sign up

Post updates

Never miss another post!
Sign up to our Post Updates or the monthly Round Up
Sign up
Landlord Law Training

Worried about insurance?

Insurance Course

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get free guide: Free Guide 12 Costly Legal Mistakes Every Landlord Should Avoid.

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2026 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy