• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Act 2025
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

Ben Reeve Lewis Friday Newsround #180

This post is more than 11 years old

November 21, 2014 by Tessa Shepperson

Ben on a chair[Ben Reeve Lewis has done his first gig for 20 years ..]

Well I did it. My first gig for 20 years last Saturday night at Old Colfeians Rugby Club in Lee.

Thanks to the magic properties of beer the audience were immune to our many and varied foul ups, we even got people singing along and dancing.

Were we good? …….well, we got away with it, is probably the most accurate summation.

The last gig

Serendipitously I bumped into a guy I hadn’t seen in an age who reminded me that he had attended the last gig I did.

Woolwich Tramshed in 1994, where a 28 stone male stripper got up to share the encore singing Wild Thing, stripped butt naked as a result of which we were banned from the Tramshed for life, which I thought was a tad harsh.

But he filled me in on the part of the story I didn’t know, that the stripper had punched the venue manager’s wife when she protested at his naked shenanigans, so I understand the manager’s reaction.

Now THAT’S a way to end a career I’m sure you’ll agree! A crap gig and a naked brawl with an obese stripper.

I’m having to get ahead of the game this week as I’m away training the good staff of the homelessness unit for Poole Council for a few days, at a time when I am normally writing this column, so it might not be as up to date as I would like.

Getting benefit tenants a bad name …

Dodgy housing fraudsters however are always topical and I read of Angella Brown, a Croydon resident who lied about being homeless to obtain a council house whilst driving around in a Beemer and sending her kids to private schools.

She had managed to trouser £43,000 in benefits she wasn’t entitled to over a 10 year period and got 12 months in nick.

Of course she will be in a Cat D prison after two months, which will afford her weekends at home and even the chance to work outside and she’ll be released after 4 months. As usual the punishment doesn’t really fit the crime and is little deterrent.

Accelerating the acclerated procedure

Many landlords will be heartened by the news that from November the 12th accelerated claims for possession can now be started using an online form, a service previously denied for such cases.

I always thought it a pointless omission, given that section 8 claims could always be kick-started on PCOL whilst the generally mainly administrative process for accelerated claims was denied [the new service is not the same as PCOL Ben, its just an easy way to complete the form – you still have to print it off and send it through the post- Ed].

It doesn’t make a hap-Perth of difference to the tenant, who is screwed whatever way you look at it.

Naming gypsies

Whilst training the Poole council teams yesterday we got into a discussion about gypsies and travellers and I suddenly realised that I don’t know what we are supposed to call them these days.

I’ve been in housing for long enough to remember when you could get sacked for saying ‘Gypsy’. You had to say ‘Traveller’ but apparently it’s back to Gypsies now and Travellers are something else.

So I was helped by reading an article in Inside Housing  about a protest from gypsy and traveller groups saying that changes in the law mean that their needs won’t be properly assessed.

Looks like we can say gypsy again with impunity.

In the comments below the article, ‘Man with Abacus’ quite rightly pointed up some other linguistic gems that need clarifying

“I think the CLG should have started redefining elsewhere..how about…’affordable rent’ that actually is?..’Transparent’ regulation that people can see happening?…’Value for money’, regulation that doesn’t rely on expensive advisers and consultants?…’Housing delivery’. Programmes that do!”

Way to go my man.

Whose buying up London?

The Opt Connect website gave us some interesting figures  that Chinese, Russian and Arab property investors are taking a back seat to Africans when it comes to buying prime central London property as investment opportunities.

Since 2007 the rich of Africa account for around half of all purchases.

The report tells us that Angola is the next one to watch, with investors from that country coming up the inside straight.

If you read my article last week I reported on a family renting two properties from different housing associations, sub letting them and pocketing the extra whilst living in Angola. Maybe that’s where the money comes from. Recycling of a sort.

The makeup of social housing

The really interesting news item this week comes from a report published by the University of York on the makeup of social housing tenants.

The figures reveal that contrary to the opinions of so many cab drivers, single mothers and migrants get no extra priority in the allocation of social housing.

The report took three years of research found the following interesting points:

“• Two thirds of residents who could reasonably be expected to work do. Despite this, however, three quarters were faring no better than ‘holding steady’ financially, given the nature of their work, hours and levels of pay

• Being in work does not always guarantee financial security – many of the jobs taken by residents do not necessarily lead to a steady state financially

• Respondents generally wait a long time to secure a social housing tenancy and, consequently, place a high value on it

• Social housing tenancy was seen as supporting people through many of the challenges of life, protecting and strengthening the family unit, insulating against shocks which might otherwise lead to homelessness, and offering the opportunity to aspire and to achieve independence from benefits.

Cameron and Osborne and particularly Lord Fraud and IDS need to be battered around the head with a copy of this until they cry for mercy.

CEO of Circle Housing Mark Rogers said:

“This research shows there are no easy answers for policy makers. Social housing residents are not ‘shirkers’, but a diverse, complex mix of ordinary households trying to get by and thrive in the best way they can.”

Nice one.

What made me smile this week

A collection of the top 40 most crass and embarrassing quotes from Richard Madeley

of Richard and Judy fame  proving that Alan Partridge is not in fact a fictional character. My favourite quote being something he said to the late reality TV celeb Jade Goody:

“You’re quite sharp. Its just in the pure sense of the word that you’re ignorant”

AH-HAAAAAA.

See ya next week.

Previous Post
Next Post

Filed Under: News and comment

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Reader Interactions

Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Comments

  1. just saying says

    November 21, 2014 at 2:41 pm

    Ben – it’s “who’s”.

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list and get a free eBook
Sign up

Post updates

Never miss another post!
Sign up to our Post Updates or the monthly Round Up
Sign up

Worried about insurance?

Insurance Course

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get a free eBook

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2026 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy