A recent article on the BBC news site, complains that landlords are avoiding the HMO licensing regulations by developing HMOs in buildings which do not come within the categories which require licensing, which in most cases requires a building to have three or more stories. Hence, the article implies, landlords are able to get away with shocking standards with impunity.
Well yes, but thats not wholly because of the HMO legislation. There is already power available to Local Authorities to deal with substandard properties. Under part 1 of the Housing Act 2004, Local Authorities can carry out inspections on properties under the Housing Health and Safety Rating System and serve improvement notices on the landlord requiring him to bring the property up to standard. If the landlord fails to do this, the Local Authority can prosecute, and also has the power to get the repair works done itself (and recoup the cost from the landlord).
Any one can contact the Local Authority if they are concerned about the standard of a property, it does not have to be the tenant. Local Authorities have a general duty to “keep the housing conditions in their area under review with a view to identifying any action that may need to be taken by them” (s3(1)).
Then there are the HMO management regulations. These require all HMOs to be managed properly and comply with basic standards. Landlords not complying with these, can also be prosecuted.
So although extending the licensing requirements might help, Local Authorities already have powers to deal with shoddy properties in their area, whether they are HMOs or not. The problem, so far as I can see, is not lack of power to do these things, but lack of funding and manpower. Presumably, as Mr Brown has mortgaged the country in order to pay the banks, this is not a situation which is likely to improve in the near future. What do you think?
My Exact comment back to CLG about the whole idea of licensing landlords and agents. With HHSRS, Management orders and other powers all the power is there but no one is enforcing it. If we have a new body handling licensing of landlords and agents why does anyone think that will make any difference? Unless such a body has the resources to enforce, it will be meaningless and running another one or two bodies (one for landlords and one for agents) will simply cost more for no benefit.
Lack of knowledge is more likely to be to blame. How many staff at local authorities have even heard of HHSRS never mind are working on enforcing it?
Also does "Joe Public" know anything about the fact that they can report ANY residential property, whether they have an interest in it or not? I'm not sure they do.
I have and will continue to report to local authorities where I see my competitors acting in a "shoddy" fashion. I have no problem with this at all.
How many readers have actually notified a local authority under these rules? Are we not all as much to blame as anyone else?