We have a new government in place – and quite by chance, a major review of housing has just been published by the House of Lords Select Committee of Economic Affairs on ‘Building more Homes’.
It is an interesting read.
The report is highly critical of Government Policy over the past years and concludes that it has had a detrimental effect on housing and housing supply.
Building more homes – the report
So what does it say? Basically many of the things that Ben and I have been banging on about for years:
For example, that insufficient houses have been built over a prolonged period – due largely to the fact that Local Authorities are no longer able to do so.
The private market (it goes on to say) cannot be expected to fill the gap – and indeed it is not in its interests to do so. Therefore, rules should be changed to allow Local Authorities to borrow and start building again in a big way.
53 … Government cannot rely on the private sector alone to build the homes the country needs. The gap between what can realistically be expected and what is needed is simply too large. …
56 Local authorities and housing associations need to make a much bigger contribution to housebuilding if it is to reach required levels.
The report also claims Government has paid too much attention to encouraging owner occupation and not enough to rented property – which houses around 1/3 of the population. Plus, constant government intervention, has had a negative effect:
61. Government must recognise the effect that constant changes in public policy have on the housing market; housebuilders, housing associations and local authorities are unlikely to commit to large building programmes amid such uncertainty.
Recommendations include:
- Lifting restraints on Local Authority borrowing to allow them to build
- Penalising (eg by charging Council Tax on) developments which are not completed quickly
- Building low-cost housing on surplus government held land – and putting responsibility for implementing this into the hands of a ‘senior cabinet minister’.
- Improving the planning system and also increasing planning fees which should then be ringfenced for the development of planning departments.
All of these would hopefully result in building more homes.
A few things occur to me:
First – do we have sufficient skilled workers?
If we are going to build the 300,000 houses per year that we need, that will take a lot of builders. I suspect there will turn out to be a serious undersupply.
However, I suppose that if properties are being built by Local Authorities they could combine this with training schemes for young people and the unemployed.
Second – do we have sufficient building materials?
I remember reading a few months back that there is a general shortage of bricks.
One way to deal with this would be to use building techniques which do not use many bricks. Pre-fabricated houses have come a long way from the pre fabs on the 1950s and (if the Grand Designs programs I have watched are anything to go by) can be pretty good. There is also straw which creates nice well-insulated homes.
Third – what about the right to buy?
It’s not much incentive to Local Authorities to build if the properties are then going to be sold off at an undervalue.
Wales has recently announced that they are ditching right to buy. Ideally, England should do this too. However, this may be a step too far for a Conservative Government.
What happens next?
We now have a completely new government headed by a woman who has indicated that she wishes to make a clean break from the previous administration.
I would urge her to follow the advice given by this House of Lords report, so hopefully, we can start to make inroads into our housing crisis.
This is one way she can help those working class families she spoke to in her inaugural speech.
And finally
A You Tube video was released at the same time as the report which you can watch below.
You can read the select committee Building More Homes report here.
I agree with your analysis on how to solve the social housing problem but for one fatal flaw. This government are simply against social housing and are trying to eradicate it. This report sets out the issues and I’m sure government would agree but it just isnt on their agenda to address the problems being raised. They want the death of social housing period.
Mrs May has indicated that she is running a different administration which wants to help ‘ordinary working class families’.
This report gives her a good excuse to break from the previous agenda. We can but hope. After all the report makes it very clear that without social house building we just won’t have enough properties.
Hi Tessa
I’m struggling to bring myself to read beyond the first line of para six of this blog.
“The private market (it goes on to say) cannot be expected to fill the gap”
Does Government not realise that George Osborne’s policies (s24 and the extra 3% on SDLT) will disincentive private sector investment, thus increasing the hole?
Their strategies remind me of somebody trying to fill a bath whilst their kids pull the plug out.
Did you know that the English Housing survey of 2013 accredited the PRS with 83% of housing growth for the period of 1996 to 2013 for instance?
I have started a new campaign over on Property118 including tools to enable our members to brief their MP’s.
Please see https://www.property118.com/respect-private-landlords/88865/
We also hope to get these points debated at the Convervative Party Conference by tabling the following motion …
“ This party supports /encourages private enterprises, in whatever form, that will increase the supply homes and will strip away any barriers/legislation that deters or discourages such investment”.
Here in the South East there is a tremendous amount of house building going on and I’m sure most builders are fully employed – or they should be.
It seems to me that we should adopt an approach more like Germany which allows owners with a little land to build an extra property or two provided there is plenty of space. UK local governments are inconsistent in their approach. Horsham District Council, for example, is quite happy to give consent to huge developments of 2,000 homes around the small market town, but if a local landowner with a couple of acres wants to build one new house with a nice garden, there’s virtually no chance. Or at least it’ll cost tens of thousands of pounds to get it through after appeals etc.
I think it’s shame since so many of our new housing estates are crammed together. The houses may look nice (although far too many are pretty badly built), but people choose semi-rural areas because they want more space around them. Obviously it’s different for those who choose to live in cities, but try to find a new home in the Home Counties with more than a scrap of a garden and you’ll probably pay over £1million.
We certainly don’t want totally liberal planning laws, but some consistency across the country and some leeway to build nice houses in good areas would be beneficial to everyone and help (just a little) to ease the supply. It would also provide work for local builders who are real craftsmen and don’t want to join the get-em-up-quick culture.