• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • About
  • My Services
  • Training and Events
  • Landlord Law
Landlord Law Blog

The Landlord Law Blog

Interesting posts on residential landlord & tenant law and practice In England & Wales UK

  • Home
  • Posts
  • News
    & comment
  • Analysis
  • Cases
  • Tips &
    How to
  • Tenants
  • Clinic
    • Ask your question
    • Clinic replies
    • Blog Clinic Fast Track
  • Series
    • Renters Rights Act 2025
    • Renters Rights Bill
    • Election 2024
    • Audios
    • Urban Myths
    • New Welsh Laws
    • Local Authority Help for ‘Green improvements’ to property
    • The end of s21 – Protecting your position
    • End of Section 21
    • Should law and justice be free?
    • Grounds for Eviction
    • HMO Basics

What are the chances of this landlord claiming for this dirty carpet?

This post is more than 9 years old

August 8, 2016 by Tessa Shepperson

FlatsHere is a question to the blog clinic from Sarah (not her real name) who is a tenant

I recently vacated a property in Gloucester and moved to London. Before we moved out I volunteered to get the carpets cleaned but my landlord refused it and said she will take care of it once I move out.

During their inspection of the property (after a week past my move out) they found that the living room carpet is way too dirty. I don’t deny that it wasn’t and that is the same reason why I wanted to get it professionally cleaned before I moved out.

The landlord asked a 3rd party agent to make a report on the amount of cleaning required and the agent has said that the carpets needs to be replaced as they are beyond cleaning stage.

The landlord wants to charge me for the complete replacement of the carpet. What bothers me is I didn’t get a chance to clean the carpet by pros, I have to rely on the Landlord’s judgement completely and cannot talk to other cleaning agents and get their views on the state of the carpet.

Moreover, the carpet was not new when we moved in so why should I end up paying for a brand new one? The landlord claims the dirty carpet as property damage.

I would like to know what are my options here? Do I need to bear the carpet replacement cost?

Answer

My view here, is that the landlord is at fault. By refusing to allow you to get the carpets professionally cleaned and by carrying out the check a week after you had moved away (meaning that you were not able to participate in the checkout) my view is that the landlord has made herself responsible.

I think the landlord’s claim should be challenged by referring it to adjudication.  Your case will be stronger if you can prove:

  • The landlord’s refusal to allow you to have the carpets professionally cleaned – eg by having them in an email
  • That the landlord knew that you would be living in another part of the country at the time of the checkout

Even if the adjudicator agrees with the landlord that you are responsible for the cost, you will only be responsible for a proportion of the cost as the carpet was not new when you moved in.

There is a formula which needs to be followed in this situation in order to avoid ‘betterment’ which is where a tenant pays a disproportionate amount to the landlord. The formula provides that the tenant only pays for a proportion of the cost to reflect the time the item was in their care.

But no doubt many readers will be more experienced in this situation – what is your view? Has the landlord lost her chance of recovery by refusing to allow the tenant to pay for professional cleaning in your opinion?

Previous Post
Next Post

Filed Under: Clinic Tagged With: Adjudication

Notes:

Please check the date of the post - remember, if it is an old post, the law may have changed since it was written.

You should always get independent legal advice before taking any action.

Reader Interactions

Please read our terms of use and comments policy. Comments close after three months

Comments

  1. david collum says

    August 8, 2016 at 6:05 pm

    during a CCJ hearing over several issues the Judge quoted that the cost to the tenant for replacing a damaged carpet should be worked out on the a five year rule. therefore if the carpet was 3 yrs old only 40%(2yrs) was payable by the tenant

  2. Alexandra Coghlan-Forbes says

    August 9, 2016 at 12:26 pm

    Thank you Tessa for bringing this to my attention, as Head of Adjudication for The DPS.

    In essence, I agree with your view. Adjudicators at The DPS’ free, impartial Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) service would look at what actions were reasonable in the circumstances described.

    If the tenant could provide evidence that she was clearly informed by the landlord not to clean the carpets, such as emails or text messages, then it’s likely the adjudicator will conclude that the tenant has acted reasonably in following those instructions. However, if the tenant couldn’t provide solid evidence to support her claim and the adjudicator decided replacing the carpet was reasonable, then the landlord would most likely be compensated for the cost of the carpet’s lost remaining lifespan based on the evidence provided about its age and condition.

    We always encourage landlords to invite the tenant to check out so they can discuss the condition of the property and its contents as well as any other issues and try to reach an agreement without the need for adjudication. If landlords want to read more about improving their check outs, we’ve created some top tips, which are available on our website.

    https://www.depositprotection.com/documents/top-ten-check-out-tips.jpg

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list and get a free eBook
Sign up

Post updates

Never miss another post!
Sign up to our Post Updates or the monthly Round Up
Sign up

Worried about insurance?

Insurance Course

Sign up to the Landlord Law mailing list

And get a free eBook

Sign up

Footer

Disclaimer

The purpose of this blog is to provide information, comment and discussion.

Please, when reading, always check the date of the post. Be careful about reading older posts as the law may have changed since they were written.

Note that although we may, from time to time, give helpful comments to readers’ questions, these can only be based on the information given by the reader in his or her comment, which may not contain all material facts.

Any comments or suggestions provided by Tessa or any guest bloggers should not, therefore be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice from a qualified lawyer regarding any actual legal issue or dispute.

Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or perceived as creating a lawyer-client relationship (apart from the Fast Track block clinic service – so far as the questioners only are concerned).

Please also note that any opinion expressed by a guest blogger is his or hers alone, and does not necessarily reflect the views of Tessa Shepperson, or the other writers on this blog.

Note that we do not accept any unsolicited guest blogs, so please do not ask. Neither do we accept advertising or paid links.

Cookies

You can find out more about our use of 'cookies' on this website here.

Other sites

Landlord Law
The Renters Guide
Lodger Landlord
Your Law Store

Legal

Landlord Law Blog is © 2006 – 2025 Tessa Shepperson

Note that Tessa is an introducer for Alan Boswell Insurance Brokers and will get a commission from sales made via links on this website.

Property Investor Bureau The Landlord Law Blog


Copyright © 2026 · Log in · Privacy | Contact | Comments Policy